this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
223 points (99.6% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

3 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In the past, when there was a much higher tax on high income earners, instead of paying more in taxes, they would spread the wealth a little more equitably. This was true in Hollywood, in corporations, hell, in working service industry jobs. There were still rich, but so were others. In the past 40 years, we have been experiencing the greatest wealth transfer (over $50 fucking trillion ) from the working class to the 1% ever. And it's poised to get worse. Anyone who doesn't support unions and a strongly progressive tax is either ignorant of the history of the US, or an asshole. There is no in between.

[–] McJonalds@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what about a movement to illegalize lobbying and remove corruption?

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Lobbying is an important and necessary government function. The Americans with Disabilities Act is the greatest success of social lobbying in history.

Unlimited dark money corporate lobbying used to be illegal and needs to be illegal again. And we need to get the regulatory capture pipeline under control somehow. Being able to leave government agencies for lucrative positions at corporations you were supposed to be regulating is the biggest problem after unlimited dark money for campaigns.

[–] freamon@feddit.nl 29 points 1 year ago

Every year, there are actors who had roles in Return of the Jedi, who get letters informing that although their contact entitles them to money that film's net profit, sadly Return of the Jedi hasn't made any profit yet!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Huh. The circus is going on strike.

If the bread (food service workers) goes on strike too, maybe we’ll see some real change.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

The real strike now needs to be sfx and postprod. At the moment studios are banking on what's in the pipeline

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Half the food service workers are paid in tips. Which is a giant and very effective bandaid to the issue.

The reality is, the income is pretty good for most tipped food service work. Better than in most comparable jobs. The bosses taking themselves out of the equation makes the effective wages pretty decent, even if it feels pretty ugly for everyone else. There's a huge anti-tip movement growing... maybe that's the 4D chess. Get rid of all the tips to ensure food service workers get paid absolute crap just like everyone else so that they show a bit more solidarity with other jobs. But really, it's probably just people who want to pay less and haven't 100% thought through the counterfactual of how the world without tips will look for the workers, absent fixing the fundamental issues of wage society as they currently exist first. Tips work out in practice to revenue sharing. Until wage laws include some amount of mandatory revenue sharing to workers (which they absolutely should for so many reasons), getting rid of tips will hurt the workers.

I'd like to see some regional cookery unions, though. Even in places where the line cook wages aren't that terrible, those are still the worst-treated people in a restaurant. They're treated as totally disposable and interchangeable. They need a union that represents not just the members of any particular store, but disparate stores in a geographic area.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not everywhere, that's for sure.

The waitresses said they make the federal minimum wage for tipped workers, which is $2.13 per hour. The intention is that the bulk of their income will primarily come from tips. Schoolmeester-Cochran estimated she works anywhere from 21 to 35 hours each week and, with tips, brings in a salary ranging from $70 some weeks to $170 others. <-- Waffle House employee

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

But the rare places they don't are also places where the alternative is fed min wage -- also unlivable poverty -- , under table submin wage, or no job at all / mlm psychosis.

I get it's unpopular to speak in support of tips. People hate tipping so much. But until we seriously talk about what will replace it, all the demands to ban it are just part of false consciousness. We need to be more honest that most of the antitip culture is not coming from people who want the working class supported. It comes from people who think these workers are being paid too much.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

I'm not surprised. There was a tweet from Ed Soloman, one of the writers on Men In Black, some time ago now, showing his yearly statement of residuals on that film.

Despite making almost $600m on a $90m budget and spawning a franchise, he was informed by the statement that the film was a loss for Sony and the studio is still in the red.

[–] jan75@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What's up with the writing - seems kinda weird, are the tweets real? I don't have twitter so i (semmingly?) can't check myself.

I like John Cusack, he's a great actor and seems like a decent human being, so no big deal either way but just wondering what's up with that.

[–] chromebby@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

I've been on his IG page. I think that's just how he sounds.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, John Cusack has always been kind of a weirdo

[–] norbert@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A badass weirdo but yeah.

The whole family has always seemed a little weird, they're great actors though.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Loved Joan, and the cast as a whole, in Toys! Very weird!

[–] slowd0wn@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Huh, he must’ve really believed that kickboxing was the sport of the future

[–] ShoePaste@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean? What's wrong with the writing?

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's not the worst. Could use some editing, and it's a little run-on, but otherwise alright.

[–] nickknack@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

agreed, this almost read like a trump post

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

I love this, John, but for pete's sake please go find a writer on the picket lines to write these, this is such a mess to read.

[–] money_loo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At one point he mentions a well known actress making 1/7th the salary of her male co-star, and that she was making just under 4K a week.

So there’s clearly money to go around if the dudes can get 28k a week, and the “shows or movies are losing millions” argument the accountants and tax dealers use makes no sense

[–] june@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

really, none of this is new. we've known all of this for a long, long time, haven't we?

load more comments
view more: next ›