this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
251 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

57997 readers
5269 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/889819

The EU General Court in Luxembourg ruled that the designation was warranted under the European Union's new Digital Markets Act (DMA) because short video app TikTok exceeded relevant thresholds including global market value and the number of EU users.

Labeled companies are prevented from forcing users in the bloc to consent to have access to a service or certain functionalities.

ByteDance had argued that its global market value largely came from China, rather than the EU.

It also said TikTok does not operate an exponential user expansion model and that it was acting as a "challenger" to digital monopolies operated by established platforms such as Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, and Alphabet, which owns Google. Both companies are also designated as "gatekeepers."

But the EU General Court rejected those arguments, finding that TikTok could no longer be considered a "challenger" on the market, unlike when it joined back in 2018.

The judges concluded that TikTok had "succeeded in increasing its number of users very rapidly and exponentially" since then, and that its large number of European users does indeed contribute to its global market value.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Another based move from the EU

[–] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, we just can't stop getting W's

Like the time the EU Commission tried to circumvent E2EE but failed

Or the other time our EU Commission tried to circumvent E2EE but failed

Or the other time... why the fuck are they trying this like every 2 weeks? They're currently working on a new proposal but just recently ~~stopped~~ paused because they estimated that it wouldn't pass the parliament

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah there are plenty of things to criticize about the EU but at least they are mostly open about their attempts at undermining democracy.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

They're open about their attempts to open your chat log.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Because there are people who got put there to try to push that stuff.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and that it was acting as a "challenger" to digital monopolies operated by established platforms such as Meta,

Did those in the room burst out into laughter at this point?

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

And then they unveiled their, "ByteDance: We're totally not the CCP" logo.

And everyone laughed harder.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I love that they're treating all the companies equally, like Meta and Alphabet, too. Unlike the US. How do we get EU tech policies in the US? 😭

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First step, make lobbying illegal ffs

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a big step considering the people who would make the laws are corrupt from lobbying.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

thatsthepoint.jpg

You can't and shouldn't expect things to change thanks to the current ruling class