Technology

You will have to repeat that again and again, because people don't know what LLMs are. They have been told that we have AIs and don't understand that what they actually use are digital parrots (minus the intelligence of an actual parrot).

This is the frustrating part of it. The public doesn't understand what's actually happening, or what the goal of these large language models is, so because they're very convincing conversationalists, your average Joe considers them as true AI.

It's just weird that we get so much humanlike reasoning from them, anyways. The jury's still out whether our brains learn in an autoregressive manner like that, too. I'm finding a lot of really cool results in my research by tinkering with the idea that a developing brain might just be constantly trying to guess what's happening next.

Seems pretty plausible to me that passive learning in humans works similar to next-token prediction in transformers.

They don't spend any time/money cleaning the data!!!!

They don't care if it is right or wrong, hence why they are shifting focus to "arts" "creative" etc

Anything that requires correct inputs, will require a professional who can tell if LLM is right. It is helpful but it will not replace shiti organics yet.

It can draw some shiti pictures for some shiti spyube channel, its fine but it looks odd. I don't like it. I don't like it being used so i avoid clowns who use it.