this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
2 points (66.7% liked)

Lemmy.ca's Main Community

2805 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to lemmy.ca's c/main!

Since everyone on lemmy.ca gets subscribed here, this is the place to chat about the goings on at lemmy.ca, support-type items, suggestions, etc.

Announcements can be found at https://lemmy.ca/c/meta

For support related to this instance, use https://lemmy.ca/c/lemmy_ca_support

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Shadow@lemmy.ca to c/main@lemmy.ca
 

Sorry (🍁) we did this without making a post, but after receiving several complaints we defederated from hexbear.net yesterday.

Here's a few quick examples of poor conduct by hexbear users:

They warned their users to behave themselves, but that didn't work: https://hexbear.net/post/280770?scrollToComments=false

Please read and respect the rules of the community instance in which you are posting/commenting. Please try to keep the dirtbag lib-dunking to hexbear itself. Do not follow the Chapo Rules of Posting, instead try to engage utilizing informed rhetoric with sources to dismantle western propaganda. Posting the western atrocity propaganda and pig poop balls is hilarious but will pretty quickly get you banned and if enough of us do it defederated. Realize that you are a representative of the hexbear instance when you post on other instances.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I noticed a few of them posting Russian propaganda the other day. Nothing of value was lost.

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They absolutely do. They are freaks of nature.

Essentially communists who support the war crimes committed in Ukriane and the idea of Russian imperialism since it somehow in their twisted little minds equates to a Soviet Union born again.

Wrap your head around that.

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I still just don't understand why they defend Russia or China, I don't think there's a single state mechanism you can point to that's truly functionally communistic.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

They get it into their heads that they're smarter than everyone else because they have views that aren't popular, and shut out any evidence that their views might just be wrong and actively harmful.

[–] mancy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good work! Thank you. Hexbear users are trolls. They’re not in it for discussion in good faith. I’ve blocked a few offenders here and there but honestly I think the culture there is so toxic that we’re better off not being federated with them.

[–] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

100% agree that they are trolls. They flood any China news posts (that's not on lemmy.world) with a truckload of pro-China comments, taking advantage of the fact that a sizeable portion of Lemmy users won't be able to see and downvote them. Whenever someone replies to them with well-thought-out arguments supporting "the western authoritarians," half of them replies with huge and ugly emojis, while the other half parrots more Chinese propaganda (that actually sound well-written if you disregard the fact that China is an oppressive regime).

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I browsed a bit there. All I saw was trolls planning to troll. They won't be missed.

Federation is working.

[–] Anon819450514@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Until they decide to 'raid' instances and start their circus again.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I hope the admins on those raided instances are more effective than the admins on hexbear were.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, they already are raiding and brigading. Take a look at any post remotely mentioning China, Russia or Ukraine on lemmy.ml or any other instance still federated with them. 90% of the comments will be Hexbear users trolling, harassing people or spreading disinformation, shutting out any real discussion.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I'm all for differing viewpoints but they were just trolls.

[–] Ejh3k@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's wrong with hating landlords?

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No calls for violence seems like a simple rule. And not every landlord is greedy mcshitstain with 50 properties, many of them are a single family with their starter home rented out, or a couple renting out their extra room.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Communists don't care for that distinction, they believe all landlords (even non-exploitative ones like you mentioned) are inherrently exploitative and therefore deserving of death. Yes, this applies to you even if you just rent out a room, but don't worry, money won't exist and everything will be free!

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Correction, terminally-online twitter communists don't care for the distinction. People who actually go outside and put in the work aren't making enemies out of individuals renting out a room, they're too busy going after giant multi-national corporations buying out all the houses so that nobody else can get them, and then jacking up the rents once there's no alternatives.

Communism is about systems, not individuals. Anyone saying otherwise is either disinformed or is a radical liberal playing make-believe

[–] lud@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Calling for execution of anyone seems a bit extreme to me.

[–] Ejh3k@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably not by whipping out the guillotine. There's a few reasonable steps before that.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

This is why our rights are constantly being eroded.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have been visiting hexbear recently. I have discovered that there is a great deal of content there that is important to me and that I have been "protected" from. It's clearly a legitimate instance with a dedicated administration team. The Lemmiverse is moving fast and changing dramatically. Would @Shadow@lemmy.ca, @smorks@lemmy.ca, et al consider reviewing this decision now that it is about a year later?

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Always open to reconsidering things. Can you give some examples of the content you're missing?

Tbh when I go look at their local feed it just seems like all shitposts

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For example, c/food is the best general population food forum I've ever seen for my particular needs. A lot of the non-vegan parts of the site is not just tolerant but considerate to vegans. That's frigging unheard of. I don't know what the big deal with shit posters is, but that is hardly the only or defining feature of the culture.

I feel like if you wade into a community you're not a member of and don't understand looking for shit posts, a lot of things are going to look like shit posts.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the input! Discussing it with the other admins.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago

There's always the far better-behaved Lemmygrad for those who want a more diverse prospective without the toxicity that hexbear brings.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Probably get banned for this comment but all of the rights we have were taken via violence. Nothing else is going to stop feudalism in this country except violence. That guy threatening landlords is, like it or not, correct

Not that I want to go killing people, but that's quite literally the only way change is made throughout all of human history

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What childish nonsense. You have no absolute rights as a member of a society. Every right is limited and every law limits a right. Virtually none of those were passed through violence.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you not know how Canada became a country??

If you think laws will be peacefully passed that grants housing to all Canadians you are delusional

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

156 years ago?

Dude, it's time to move on.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's time for a revolution actually

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's time for change. We are a long, long way from revolution.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I am not a long way from living on the street lol

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One person is not a revolution.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are hundreds of homeless people in my small city of Victoria alone

Ever been to Vancouver?

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. I'll be there in the middle of September.

A few hundred homeless people do not a revolution make (or a few thousand, or a few tens of thousands.) You can fantasize about it by the reality is that you end up dead or in prison if you try.

We need change, that is an absolute truth, but we are a long, long way from revolution.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ok well just wait till you see how aggressive and violent homeless people have become haha. It's not friendly begging anymore and I don't blame them

Agree that it's fantasy though. Canada is spineless

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

I'll be fine.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How many Canadians had to take up arms and murder their countrymen to get gay marriage and cannabis reform? The other side certainly used a lot of violence, AND THEY LOST. I only have to come up with one counterexample and there's two.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

That's it. That's all there is to it. It is true that some rights took violence to establish, but clearly there are plenty that didn't. If for example it takes violence to fix our housing problems, then I guess that's what would have been needed, but there are plenty of options before we get there.

[–] kugel7c@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes violence can be both successful and unsuccessful but to begin with the state likely used violence against violent supporters of bad drug policy and bigoted marriage laws, or alternatively against covid deniers and what not. On the other hand people did riot for weed and gayness 50 or so years ago and continually violently defended themselves in their continued (political) existence for these years. Political change, even if the laws change relatively non violently at the end, needs violence or at least the threat of violence to come about.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're moving the goalpost. We're talking about executions. Fucking terrorism. That is NOT the way social causes are advanced.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This seems like it could have been solved at the instance level by banning some emojis... So I guess I'm confused?

I still don't agree with censoring political views that we disagree with. It's a slippery slope, especially when these are REAL people that DO exist. They deserve to have their voice heard, even if it's so they can be shit on.

Edit: is there no way to block individual users without defederation? It sounds like taking the nuclear option against a few bad actors. We should want to have our worldview challenged since that's a core component of democracy.

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

views that we disagree with

a few bad actors

Please stop with all those disingenous takes. OP makes it quite clear that it was not based on differences in viewpoint but toxic and trolling behaviour. And it is not "a few bad actors" from that instance behaving in such a way, it is everyone, since that is their publicly stated main purpose for existing.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Their community policy is explicitly against the actions described in this post.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blatant indifference to their own community policies is an excellent reason to defederate.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

And everyone on lemmy.ca follows community guidelines? Let's be realistic. It's a few bad actors (that we've already isolated!), just ban them.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please read and respect the rules of the community instance in which you are posting/commenting. Please try to keep the dirtbag lib-dunking to hexbear itself. Do not follow the Chapo Rules of Posting, instead try to engage utilizing informed rhetoric with sources to dismantle western propaganda. Posting the western atrocity propaganda and pig poop balls is hilarious but will pretty quickly get you banned and if enough of us do it defederated. Realize that you are a representative of the hexbear instance when you post on other instances.

"Come on guys. [Wink] [Wink] Cool it or we're going to get defederated. [Wink] [Wink]"

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

hexbear when the consequences of their actions