223
submitted 3 weeks ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

The US swimmer Lia Thomas, who rose to global prominence after becoming the first transgender athlete to win a NCAA college title in March 2022, has lost a legal case against World Aquatics at the court of arbitration for sport – and with it any hopes of making next month’s Paris Olympics.

The 25-year-old also remains barred from swimming in the female category after failing to overturn rules introduced by swimming’s governing body in the summer of 2022, which prohibit anyone who has undergone “any part of male puberty” from the female category.

Thomas had argued that those rules should be declared “invalid and unlawful” as they were contrary to the Olympic charter and the World Aquatics constitution.

However, in a 24-page decision, the court concluded that Thomas was “simply not entitled to engage with eligibility to compete in WA competitions” as someone who was no longer a member of US swimming.

The news was welcomed by World Aquatics, who hailed it as “a major step forward in our efforts to protect women’s sport”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 257 points 3 weeks ago

I know I'm gonna catch heat for this, but sex-segregated physical competitions is one of the very few places where trans women shouldn't be treated the same. Women's sports competitions aren't segregated by gender, they're segregated by sex. Trans women are women in gender, but their body isn't a biologically female body. That's the exact definition of transgender - when your body's biological sex doesn't match your sense of gender. So by definition, trans women don't have a biologically female body.

The whole point of sex-segregated sports is for people with female bodies to be able to have a fair competition, instead of them not even getting a chance to compete at all because if they had to compete against biological males then almost 100% of females wouldn't even make the team. This is the whole reason why sports competitions are segregated by sex.

TLDR trans women should always be treated as women - except for sex-segregated physical competitions

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 3 weeks ago

The thing that really sucks is that tran women are gonna get absolutely dominated by cis men. HRT for long enough really does so so much to the body (hence why most sports allow trans people who have transitioned to compete). Tho trans men also would have insane advantage overs cis women if they competed together

Maybe there isn't any good solution. But what you are saying leads to a conclusion that there is no place in sports for trans people. Then again, these conversations always fall apart when we talk about cis people with abnormal hormone profiles.

End of the day, a lot of competitive sports come down to genetics. There isn't much room for someone with disadvantagious genetics to become the best in the world. For me, I don't see much difference in a trans woman who's transitioned being world class in swimming and a tall ass cis woman dominating in basketball. Especially when we don't see trans people sweeping in competitions as a wider trend

[-] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

There is a place for trans people in sport. Male, female, trans. Done.

[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

I really don't think there are enough trans people competing at the highest levels to sustain that though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

That sounds like a more ideal compromise, though I am not sure if even that is without its own set of issues.

Basically, athletic performance falls on the same gradient as masculinity. The more masculine your body is, the more capable you are as an athlete on average. If you are a trans woman taking T blockers/estrogen supplements, your body becomes more feminine, but in turn you lose much of that athletic capability.

So hypothetically, if I am a trans woman and an athlete, where I am paid based on how well I do, am I incentivised to not take T blockers/estrogen supplements, or take them in more limited doses, in order to be a more capable athlete? Basically, am I forced to compromise my gender identity for a better paycheck?

We could force every trans athlete to undergo lab work before every match to make sure their T levels are within a certain threshold, but then is that someone's fault if their body is not being as responsive to the medication they're taking, and now they're out a job? Not to mention how that would basically force their medical history to be public knowledge.

I'm not sure I'm comfortable inviting these sorts of scenarios to occur, to be honest.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Trans women have been allowed in the Olympics for 20 years now. There have been zero trans medalists. If this advantage actually exists, why aren't they winning?

[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

If i had to guess I'd say it's simply numbers. Compared to the rest of the population, trans people are extremely rare, and so there likely just haven't been enough trans people to have been there yet.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

You knew you were going to catch heat for something that's extremely popular and common opinion?

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Bruh, I got cooked for voicing this opinion so many fucking times.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Banned from many subreddits for voicing this opinion

load more comments (48 replies)
[-] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 weeks ago

Well this comment section is awful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Obviously the solution is to have a separate trans Olympics.

/S

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 36 points 3 weeks ago

Or send them to the mens side, which is ironically is open to everyone.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago

I'm scared to reply, but is this not a plausible outcome? She is still a she, but could she compete on the men's team?

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 19 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not 100% sure about every sports organization on the planet, but generally speaking the men's divisions are open to women and nonbinary people. I can't seem to find much in the olympic rulebook, and it also doesn't seem to have been tested or ruled on.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
223 points (93.4% liked)

News

21721 readers
4904 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS