this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
281 points (97.6% liked)

grimdank

2364 readers
57 users here now

Da stompin' ground fer da dankest memes from da 41st millennium an' da Mortal Realms, right 'ere at yer central Waaagh! hub!


da roolz

  1. No Grot-Like Disrespectful Behavior!
  2. No Squig-Spit Hate Speech!
  3. All Gork 'n Mork's Tabletop Games are Smasha-Friendly!
  4. Slap on a Proper Git Tag for All Yer Not-Safe-fer-Waaagh Content!
  5. Stick to Straight-Shootin' Direct Links, No Waaagh-Warpin'!
  6. No Muckin' 'Bout with Grotty Political Posts!
  7. Keep Yer Grots in Line, No Sneaky Malicious Trolling!
  8. No Scabby Looted Pirated Content, Only Proper Stuff!
  9. Remember, Ya Gitz, Thin Yer Paint or Get a Gobsmackin' from the Mekboyz!
  10. Two Thin Coats! Ya Want It to Look Good When Ya Krump 'Em, Right?!

Grims you might like:

Imaginary Warhammer

Warhammer


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I think I saw someone do an intensive breakdown of this scene where they estimated the density of the logs, calculated their velocity by counting the number of frames it took them to collide with the walker, then calculated the crush resistance of the walker's frame by measuring how much it deformed in response to the amount of energy the logs put into it.

IIRC, the AT-ST walker has a frame approximately as durable as a family minivan. So... not like terrible... assuming you weren't taking your walker anywhere more dangerous than soccer practice, but not very impressive for military hardware.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The prevalent weapon in the SW universe are energy weapons. It could be that the AT-ST was armoured against energy weapons and not kinetic weapons. They are also scout vehicles analogous to WWII wheeled scout cars which were lightly armoured.

While not common, kinetic weapons do still exist, and are widely used by outlaws and pirates because of how cheap and easy they are to keep running.

Since I'd wager most of what the empire does by 5BBY is clearing outlaw gathering places, putting down civilian riots, and not fighting against fully equipped rebels (at least not on a scale large enough to matter in terms of designing entirely new units) they would come up against kinetics fairly often. Often enough that they would either need a separate vehicle for patrolling such areas, or the general purpose unit needs more structural integrity.

The empire does like making "good enough" units that can be deployed everywhere, so they really should make the ATST stronger.

They constantly underestimate their opponents, though.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you want to get realistic then we first have to ask why anyone would actually design an AT-ST when they can just take pictures from orbit. Why was there ground combat at all when the ships can drop kinetic weapons from orbit that have the impact of a nuke with none of the radioactivity?

Let's just enjoy the fantasy.

[–] Mithre@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because sometimes you want to keep what's on the ground without leveling it?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

But then how will everyone know how evil I am?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lucas decided the trees on Endor are part metal and are therefore hyperdense or some such nonsense

This solves all problems with the scene

Stop asking questions or the Ewoks will shit in your shoe.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That would mean when the Ewoks are cooking food metal fillings were ending up in smoke and hence food? Would explain why they are all so short, maybe they are basically kids since all of them die at a young age from metal toxicity.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

No, it means that they're like those undersea vent snails that ingest heavy metals. Ewoks are short, but they're freaky strong because of ultra dense bones and muscles!

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Teddy bears smashing imperial armor with log traps was when Star wars jumped the shark IMHO.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Certainly not its finest moment.

[–] Risus_Nex@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

As a child I loved the scenes with the teddybears. Even tho it's not realistic, it got a beautiful atmosphere.

And at the end Luke is kissing his sister, so that was weird.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I actually like the Ewok scenes outside of the end battle. The end battle though? Just makes the Imperial forces look like we never should have taken them as a serious threat.

[–] WhitePaintIsEvil@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I feel like they were constrained by the numbers they could show and the relatively happy vibe of star wars. I got the impression that the empire was supposed to be getting swarmed by ewoks. Which would have looked better. Although you can't really get away from them being teddy bears i suppose.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

I've heard it was supposed to a (very) loose analog of the Vietnam war.

[–] Davel23@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

Leia kisses Luke in ANH and ESB, no kissing in RotJ.

[–] kindernacht@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

It's a fantasy movie.

That's like saying Neverending Story is not realistic.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can someone use magically AI bullshit to make Han Solo murder Jar Jar?

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Lets be real. Jar Jar should have died in the Gungan city when he returned after being banished.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Realisticly this would probably be enough to make a two legged mech like that fall tho

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The force from each side cancels each other out, preserving perfect balance 🙏

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 15 points 9 months ago

The rule of 2 brings balance to the force (and this ATST)

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not if it scutters to the side quickly. Like spot the Boston dynamics robot in testing videos when it gets shoved sideways.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

AT-STs are not known for their lateral movement ability.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Been a while since I watched it. Was there a reason they could just drop agent orange or napalm on the Ewoks? Instead of sending in ground troops in mechs.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

They were ambushing the rebels who were trying to destroy the shield generator, they weren't anticipating the teddy bears.

They'd want the rebels in one piece in order to interrogate them about the Rbel Alliance fleets and plans. Hard to get info from a greasy smear on the forest floor.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 6 points 9 months ago

For the empire

[–] shukufuku@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

That's why I always field meltalogs

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

AT-AT stands for All Terrain Armored Transport
AT-ST stands for All Terrain Scout Transport

hence: not "Armored"
It's a Humvee on legs.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -4 points 9 months ago

The last two frames and especially the final frame do not say very much.