this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
-32 points (30.5% liked)

Technology

57997 readers
2848 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

AI telling us string theory is that silly string is safe to eat

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Add glue to your silly strings to weave them into delicious silly rope.

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Years later, after untold exaflops of computing, the AI's answer appears on the screen: "Dunno".

[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] LimpRimble@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Ya, ya, but what is the question?

[–] eggymachus@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Thanks, that was interesting. I kept thinking that this reads like something out of Quanta Magazine, and then at the end there was an attribution to them :)

To all the reflexive AI-downvoters: This is about an application of machine learning, not an LLM. Don't behave like an advanced autocomplete; think before you click :P

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a reflexive AI downvoter. I'm a reflexive String Theory downvoter.

[–] eggymachus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

...can't argue with that

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

Why not both?

[–] Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Then the author could have written the headline as "Machine Learning" instead of clickbaity word like "AI"

[–] Identity3000@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In defence of the author, there is absolutely nothing about the term "AI" that just means "LLM" in an informed context (which is what Wired portends to be). And then the words "machine learning" are literally front and centre in the subtitle.

I don't see how anyone could misunderstand this unless it was a deliberate misreading... Or else just not attempting to read it at all...

(That said, yes, I do hate the fact that product managers now love to talk about how every single feature is "AI" regardless of what it actually is/does)

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"With four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk" -- John von Neumann.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What makes up the strings?

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Theoretical physicists

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

String theory captured the ~~hearts and minds~~ careers of many physicists decades ago because of a lack of empiricism ~~beautiful simplicity~~.

Improved that somewhat.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago