this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
103 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

58485 readers
4213 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 42 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Samsung basically owns South Korea right? Could this just be them exercising their control over the government?

[–] teft@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Chaebol’s gonna chaebol.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The more things change, the more they stay the same. It's comforting, in a way.

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

How the Rich Ate South Korea

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The sources, however, claimed that Android-based smartphones, mostly those from Samsung Electronics, will be exempted from the ban, while the document explicitly states that “bringing in iPhones will be completely prohibited”.

The reason is purportedly because iPhones do not fully comply with the restrictions outlined by the National Defence Mobile Security, a mobile device management application operated by the military authorities.

For instance, when activating the security app, it begins to restrict several smartphone functions, including the camera, Wi-Fi, tethering, USB functions and the microphone.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So it sounds like MDM incompatibility is the cause of this, not iPhone security or lack thereof. I would put money on Samsung having it’s hands in this ruling.

[–] corvi@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Normally I’d say it would be ridiculous for a company to push legislation for such a small demographic, but since Korea has mandatory service still as far as I know, they basically get to put a Samsung in the hands of every male citizen. And they’ll most likely keep using the same brand of phone after.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Weird. Most companies in the US only use iPhones because the MDM is better than Android's (which is basically nonexistent).

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

Well "Samsung is exempt from this" who guessed? Its their company