this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
218 points (96.6% liked)

News

22626 readers
3714 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 69 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Primary endosymbiosis happens when one microbial organism engulfs another. It then begins to use the swallowed organisms as an internal organ. The host provides the organism–now called an endosymbiont–several benefits including nutrients, energy, and protection. When it can no longer survive on its own, the engulfed endosymbiont becomes an organ for the host called an organelle.

“It’s very rare that organelles arise from these types of things,” Tyler Coale, a co-author of the Cell study and a postdoctoral scholar at the University of California, Santa Cruz said in a statement. “The first time we think it happened, it gave rise to all complex life.”

Endosymbiosis where the host life form becomes fundamental to another organism’s function has only happened three known times. All of these instances were a major breakthroughs for evolution, since merging with their hosts became fundamental for the endosymbionts very existence.

I knew it from the headline, but they did in fact say the thing:

The first event was roughly 2.2 billion years ago. This is when a single-celled organism called archaea swallowed up a bacterium that eventually became the mitochondria. This specialized organelle is what every biology student learns is the “powerhouse of the cell” and its formation allowed for complex organisms to evolve.

They said the thing! 🤩

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

The Tuvix-ing has begun.

Oh, I have another:

For the first time in one billion years, two lifeforms truly merged into one organism

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Don't worry, they haven't invented the transporter yet, and there's plenty of coffee.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

I wonder what utility such algae may bring. It's certainly very interesting!

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 months ago

It's fusion, Steven! FUSION!

[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 10 points 4 months ago

Fusion dance?

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The team believes that this indicates that UCYN-A can be considered a full organelle. They gave it the name “nitroplast,” and it potentially began to evolve around 100 million years ago.

Ok, nice, but of course they didn't prove that such things did not evolve 1 million more times in nature (in the last billion years) ... and that scientists have still to discover.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's not exactly how this works...

Like, I'm assuming you mean it happened but died out, but because what we're talking about is insanely small, if it happens once, it's happens all around it at roughly the same time. And it's not a question of if it's more efficient than alone, it will be more efficient and out co.oete it's separate components.

That's not the barrier to entry. The barrier is two compatible things finding each other. An extreme change like this can't be selected for.

It's literally a freak chance that it can even happen. Which is why it's so infrequent

[–] modeler@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

an extreme change like this can't be selected for

I think you mean that the initial bit - where the smaller bacterium is swallowed but stays alive in its host - is the "can't be selected for". After this, if the chimera survives, then most definitely the natural selection process is in action and selection is taking place.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What I really want to know is how it produces offspring that also has both parts. Neither one's DNA has code for the other. And even if both reproduce asexually with plain old binary fission cell division, how do you get both to divide at the same time, and give each cell one of the new organelles?

[–] modeler@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Sorry for taking a long time to reply.

with plain old binary fission cell division, how do you get both to divide at the same time, and give each cell one of the new organelles?

An excellent question! Luckily it was answered in the paper. The researchers actually had a high resolution soft x-ray movie of cell division (ok, an exaggeration, they had a few micrographs showing the sequence). In the sequence, it showed how the organelles (including the novel N2 fixation one) undergoing division and each 'child' organelle ending up in different halves.

Cell division is controlled in the cell by an amazing process:

  • 2 centres are created on opposite sides of the cell
  • Structures like tethers are built that connect each centre to each of the organelles (the nucleus, mitochondria and the N2 fixators). These are called microtubules
  • The microtubules then start shortening, pulling the organelles in two directions, separating them.

The x-ray micrographs show that the N2 fixators are already integrated into this mitosis mechanism - my guess is that the N2 fixators already 'understand' the parent cell's mitosis signaling.

The authors also say that the organelles have lost a number of genes for essential cellular functions, relying on the parent cell to provide those capabilities. By comparison, mitochondria have only 37 genes left, and chloroplasts weren't known for having any DNA when I was at school, but are now known to have about 110 genes.

In other words, a lot of evolution has already occurred and they are well on the way to being 'proper' organelles.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They aren't trying to. This is the first time it's been observed happening.

[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If not, then the article misrepresented. The title is completely clear on claiming it hasn't happened in a billion years.

For the first time in one billion years, two lifeforms truly merged into one organism

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah well it's from an outlet literally named "popular science". If you want accuracy, read the actual papers.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 4 points 4 months ago

Now, a team of scientists have detected a sign of a major life event that has likely not occurred for at least one billion years.

The headlines aren't written by the journalists.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 5 points 4 months ago

I ship these two.

[–] Smite6645@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

When your best friend gets married and disappears into the relationship.