this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024

56 points (82.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43777 readers

1041 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What do you think will happen if we don't pass the aid for Ukraine? (lemm.ee)

submitted 6 months ago by lemmylem@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

171 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 65 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Please define "we". This is a international community so you can't assume that everyone lives in the same country as you.

[–] nawordar@lemmy.ml 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The Default Country, I guess

[–] PatMustard@feddit.uk 36 points 6 months ago

We're on a lemmy.ml community, so Mali I guess

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Rome?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The country that's not part of the rest of the world

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Palestine according to the USA

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] pumpkinseedoil@feddit.de 14 points 6 months ago

I'll assume they mean the countries that currently support Ukraine

load more comments (4 replies)

[+] federalreverse@feddit.de 49 points 6 months ago (6 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Why do people talks so easily about US starting war with Russia? They each have thousands of nukes and if it devolves into nuclear war then earth is fucked beyond repair for at least a few centuries. This is not WW2 anymore, a war doesn't mean dropping with a bunch of soldiers on a beach, it means an apocalyptic destruction of earth.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (14 children)

That is true but at the same time, a line has to be drawn somewhere. If we just let Russia win because they have nukes, there is nothing to stop them from invading and absorbing other neighbors. We can’t let the threat of nukes keep us from doing anything and allowing for Russia and China to just invade anywhere they want.

load more comments (14 replies)

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I live in Germany, was a teenager in the 80s. We would have been ground zero then, and would be ground zero now.

I've already spent all the fear of nuclear war in the 80s. I am just not able to fear nuclear war now, anymore. The fear just dulls after nearly half a century.

The choice is to let a madman bring war to one country after another or to stop it - with the cost that stopping has a miniscule chance of me getting vaporized.

But doing nothing will keep the risk of nuclear war for another 50 years. It has to be stopped now, appeasement never did anything good.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

We have 122 vaults spread all over, just in case, no? ... No?

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] lens17@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I'm by no means an expert in international relations. However, with respect to your last paragraph, I do think that China monitors the development carefully. I would even go so far and assume that they won't act on Taiwan until the situation in the Ukraine is decided. Not because the cases are so similar, but because China and Russia seem to be important partners for each other. Right now, China is supporting Russia financially by buying resources from them (if I'm not mistaken) and also supporting them with equipment embargoed by the EU/US. China will probably know what it's risking when they attack Taiwan and I doubt that they want to create that sort of situation while one of their most important partners (might be mistaken here) is in a war that binds their resources and weakens their support for China.

On the other hand, they could also try to start the war on Taiwan soon, hoping that NATO/US stretch their support too thin.

Tl;Dr: I don't know either.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 37 points 6 months ago (21 children)

If the US doesn't pass aid for Ukraine Russia will have the ability to attrition a win eventually.

More importantly for the US, China will see the lack of support as a sign of weakness increasing the timeline for a active conflict over Taiwan.

Ukraine is a test case for Taiwan that the Chinese government is paying extreme attention to

load more comments (21 replies)

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I do still have at least a little hope Ukraine is going to win. A territory does not typically successfully invade another territory a second time. However, I continue to be outspoken for Ukraine. Without aid, Ukraine will probably do what Chechnya is doing and just resort to dirtier tactics, which I'm glad Ukraine is not doing yet.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

dirtier

tactics

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Thanks, Pipey.

[–] waka@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 6 months ago (16 children)

Ukraine alone won't be the cause for a dystopian scenario with Russia as the world government, but I don't like where it would be going if Ukraine fell. Russia surely wouldn't stop afterwards. I'd rather see a world where trade connects people than a world where governments forcefully connect people via ideologies. The latter never worked out for anyone.

load more comments (16 replies)

[–] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Who is we???

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Who is we???

Perhaps OP is a member of the US congress, trying to figure out what to vote for? 🤪

There is a nice sample of Michael Parenti talking about this kind of use of the word "we" at the beginning of this song. (lyrics here)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] kusukasaka281@lemmy.id 5 points 6 months ago

Then there will be more aid to israel.

[–] mr_satan@monyet.cc 5 points 6 months ago (6 children)

WW3, eventually. The regime won't stop. The ambition is there to rebuild the USSR. That would mean starting a conflict with NATO and, if I'm lucky, NATO will actually involve.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] ex10n@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Ukraine will continue to fight for what is rightfully theirs. They've done an outstanding job so far, and it's really highlighted the decline of Russian influence on the world stage. Russia is nothing more than a petrodollar fueled aggressor.

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments