Above all else, the training data needs to be open. It's not really free software if the model is trained using a proprietary blend of training data. And it also opens the door for training data to be obtained unethically (which we know the AI companies are already doing)
this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
133 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
60079 readers
3332 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
No it doesn't.
And it also opens the door for training data to be obtained unethically
Ethics are subjective.
The only people who say shit like that as a defence are people that 90% of people would agree are behaving unethically. Just because ethics overall are subjective doesn't mean there aren't some obvious right and wrong answers.
Mozilla send them letter with signatures. Microsoft and OpenAI will send them money. I wonder which will they choose.
Link is broken and gets a 404. It was a typo on the end.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/mozilla-pushes-feds-open-transparent-ai-models
Thank you, fixed!