Sweden officially joins NATO : worldnews

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 78 points 3 months ago

[removed by mod]

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 3 months ago

I blame the fact they built all these institutions with no clause to expel members, or which require total unanimity to do so. They really bought in to the whole "end of history" thing, I guess.

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 months ago

Yeah, this is an interesting element. Historically, allowing all members a veto, while also having no way to expel a member, means that any such institution is liable to outside meddling. The classic example is the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberum_veto -- in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth, any noble could veto anything. So all it took was buying a few nobles and it shattered.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Apparently, based on that Wikipedia article, they ended up making a new version with less strict veto rules, called the confederated sejm, which is also where I expect all these Western institutions to go eventually. TIL.

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] False@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago

Rad

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 26 points 3 months ago

Russia uses RadAway

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

It fails.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Ho_Chi_Chungus@hexbear.net 46 points 3 months ago

the little "world tension" meter in HOI4 just went up by like 3%

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] SevenOfWine@startrek.website 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Do you know why NATO annexed Sweden?

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

startrek website continuing to be the highest quality instance

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

Thanks ~~Obama~~ Putin!

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Reignited the West's arms industry as well! We had gotten complacent until Putin started the largest war in Europe since WWII.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 months ago

Guys will see this and say "hell yea"

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 months ago

hell yea

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago

I don't like the expansion of NATO, but due to Russia's recent imperialism, Sweden's and Finland's reactions are completely reasonable. A much healthier alternative would have been actually advancing towards an integrated European defense system involving EU members, with a door open to certain neighbours such as Norway, but it's pretty hard to do that when the political groups that could actually promote that alternative are schizophrenically tolerating positions such as "I'm a pacifist, so I'm advocating for my own country's disarmament despite my neighbours starting wars very recently" and "if Ukraine didn't want to get invaded, they shouldn't have sought guarantees against Russian aggression from third countries".

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

I think Europeans in general psychologically still feel themselves weak without NATO, unable to fill the needs of their own defense.

I've been reading about 1st Indochina war yesterday, so - emotionally biased.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

EU's population: 448 million

EU GDP: 19 trillion dollars

Russia's population: 143 million

Russia's GDP: 1,78 trillion dollars

Simplifying a bit here (I'm obviously taking Morocco and Belarus for granted, assuming that Turkey wouldn't attack Greece, and so on), but it's pretty much a "gotta get our shit together" situation, because there's no reason why we should depend on the US for defense, or anything else.

[-] paholg@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

I assume you meant trillion and not million for those gdp figures? Even then, they're low.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

That's about architecture more than resources. "Gotta get our shit together" doesn't negate the fact that shit isn't together yet.

It's good to have resources, but such a situation is still weakness. Only I think NATO in some sense is a contributing factor, and EU frankly too, both not in the least because of all those veto and consensus rules.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Oderus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Fuck the tankies in here and praise UN and Sweden.

[-] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 months ago

Huzzah! Welcome to the team, Sweden. We can all be self defense buddies together! =D

load more comments (9 replies)

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

Russia locked out of the Balkan Sea now?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago

They have Kaliningrad.

[-] zik@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Kaliningrad's fairly strategically useless to them now that every surrounding country's NATO though. The Suwałki Gap between Kaliningrad and Belarus used to be pivotal in potentially re-taking control of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. It would have been very difficult for NATO defend them if Russia took the gap. But now those countries are protected by NATO countries all around so Kaliningrad's a lot less useful strategically. Not to mention that there's a strong Kaliningrad independence movement so they're struggling to control it internally as well.

More here.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] SexMachineStalin@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

[-] Quastamaza@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

What a lousy website they have...

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

It's the primary source, but I do agree...

World News

Rules: