this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
82 points (91.8% liked)

News

22561 readers
5312 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia is trying to develop a nuclear space weapon that would destroy satellites by creating a massive energy wave when detonated, potentially crippling a vast swath of the commercial and government satellites that the world below depends on to talk on cell phones, pay bills, and surf the internet, according to three sources familiar with US intelligence about the weapon.

These sources gave CNN a more detailed understanding of what Russia is working on – and the threat it could pose – than the US government has previously disclosed.

Republican Rep. Mike Turner of Ohio, the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, set off a frenzy in Washington on Wednesday when he issued a statement saying his panel “had information concerning a serious national security threat.” By Friday, President Joe Biden had publicly confirmed that Turner was referring to a new Russian nuclear anti-satellite capability — but officials have steadfastly refused to discuss it further, citing the highly classified nature of the intelligence.

The weapon is still under development and is not yet in orbit, Biden administration officials have emphasized publicly. But if used, officials say, it would cross a dangerous rubicon in the history of nuclear weapons and could cause extreme disruptions to everyday life in ways that are difficult to predict.

This kind of new weapon — known generally by military space experts as a nuclear EMP — would create a pulse of electromagnetic energy and a flood of highly charged particles that would tear through space to disrupt other satellites winging around Earth.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 12 points 6 months ago

I wouldn't believe "hard-right" repubs any farther than I could throw them.

They are running cover for Putin.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 22 points 6 months ago

Did bootleg Goldeneye VHS tapes finally make it into Russia?

[–] MustrumR@kbin.social 10 points 6 months ago

Isn't that just a regular nuclear explosion in space? I don't think there's too much of development needed.

Last time I checked almost every major player just agreed we don't do that to not fuck up our future.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

So I guess no one told Russia about the Kessler effect? There is a movie, Gravity, that deals with it a bit.

Setting off a nuclear bomb in space to destroy multiple satellites I assume could start a chain reaction that would make it impossible for us to use earth orbits for future satellites or to even deliver any payloads at all into space.

Although might be good protection from aliens?

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Fuck the consequences" sounds exactly like a Putin strategy to me.

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

That probably not as true as you think. While yes there is radiation, the radiation would not linger as the atmosphere would dissipate most of the radiation

The EMP would shut off electronics for whatever country this thing is detonated over. Dependent on yield of course.

And of course the blast wave would knock many satellites, maybe even ISS, into unpredictable patterns. Most will burn up in the atmosphere, some of the most durable satellites will not. Some will ricochet to other satellites. It will be a regular FFA of countries trying to dodge space debris for the first 3 hours.

When the dust settles and citizens are without news, or internet, or sports, or podcasts, or entertainment what will happen then? I imagine not many citizens US or otherwise will be happy with Russia at all.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

I would hope it is a nuclear powered laser or even a emp, as opposed to a nuclear bomb. With the Kessler syndrome and what not.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Good enough reason to queue it up from my playlist.

Was keeping it at the end when I thought it was just another heartbreak-in-space story. It's nice to hear it actually has science that deviates from the normal rocket goes up, fuel leak detected, can't fix, rocket goes boom, end of story. (minus the drama)

[–] Shizu@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Great, now they want to fuck up space too. Earth isn't enough it seems.

When will this madness finally stop? :( I'm just trying to survive here...

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago

"Russia wants to be murderfucked by the rest of the globe"

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't think Russia is stupid enough to launch a FFA nuclear strike against every nation's satellites. While the USA has a bunch, China would lose a bunch, India, Russia would lose the ability to operate drones.

I just don't see a situation where Russia does this and China is just indifferent and sides with the country that destroyed billions in satellite equipment.

[–] Argonne@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Russia has been proven to be stupid enough the last few years

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

"If I can't win, neither of us do."

[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The Americans already did this by accident in the 50s.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What event was that?

It'd sure be a lot different today.

[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Starfish prime, I think they’re built to survive EMP blasts like the ones that would come from solar flares so a nuke probably do a lot less damage now.