this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
68 points (95.9% liked)

World News

31536 readers
662 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] noorbeast@lemmy.zip 56 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Not being American have I got this right, there is a bipartisan bill aimed at punishing South Africa for raising what the the International Court of Justice then subsequently found it plausible Israel has committed acts of genocide against Gaza?

If the US wants to advocate for adherence to a rules based order then it has to be willing to abide by it, otherwise why would others?

[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 24 points 5 months ago

PFFFT HAHAHAHA

The us? adhere to a rules-based order? That's fuckin rich. No, the US will have to be dragged kicking and screaming into the light like germany in the 40s one of these days.

[–] regul@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah but it is rules-based. The rule is that the US gets to do whatever it wants. And if other countries don't do what the US wants, then the US gets to punish them.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

USian here, it's a common misconception. It's actually the "Our rules-based international order". Perhaps unsurprisingly, our rules say that the 1st world can practice unlimited plunder on the 3rd world as long as we're mostly not too open about doing it (This part is becoming obsolete). The rules also state that any country defending itself from us is an aggressive rogue terrorist state that has opened itself up to unlimited saturation self defense, followed by plunder, by virtue of breaking the rules.

If someone notices the obvious mafia-like structure of these rules and say, tries to take it up with the ICC, the rules also say we will invade the Hague.

[–] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Notice the gradual shift from an international order based on international law to the current "rules-based" international order that has happened during the last 2 decades? The ICJ is an arbiter of international law while the rules-based order is based on arbitrary rules made by the US and mostly NATO allies not necessarily related to international law. This shift was designed for situations like this where adherence to these arbitrary rules can be used to override/ignore international law. So when the highest court in the world when it comes to international law rules that the case brought by SA has clear merit, the US can punish SA for bringing the case in the first place and pretend that's by the rules.

[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 22 points 5 months ago

I'm always skeptical of any story about a bill being submitted. There's a lot of steps between that and it even getting a vote. Is this really newsworthy? Let me know if it gets through committee, then I'll care.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 17 points 5 months ago

Those damn anti-genocide people with their political motivations

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago

US Republican congressman John James and Democratic Party congressman Jared Moskowitz

how very bipartisan

[–] Uvine_Umbra@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Look deep enough, there's gonna be a bill to install irradiated cream cheese into trident nuclear missiles...

As an American, notify us when it gets by either the house or Senate

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago

Usually the "insane" bills like these are written by crank Republicans, MTG types. This one's got a Democrat too, even if it doesn't pass it goes to show how unhinged Dems are.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Biden is destroying the USs credibility. At this rate the "rules based international order" will be just the US and some allies 🙄

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What does Biden have to do with the US Congress?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Bully

Pulpit

Also watch him sign this lol

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh, really. What credibility? Bush Sr and Jr already had demolished most of what remained, and Trump gathered up anything left and set it on fire. There was literally nothing left to destroy.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Obama created the illusion that Democratic presidents, at least, are reliable and reasonable and diplomatic rulers. Vicious imperialist monsters, yes, but ones that would abide by their own professed "rules based order". Biden is destroying that last figleaf of credibility by overreaching so hard to support Israel. I don't think anyone will be fooled about things ever going "back to normal".