267
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

In one of the largest national crackdowns on fraud targeting federal coronavirus aid, the Justice Department on Wednesday said it had brought 718 law enforcement actions in connection with the alleged theft of more than $836 million.

The vast array of criminal charges and other sanctions — part of a federal sweep conducted over the past three months — reflected the ongoing, costly work in Washington to recover stolen pandemic funds roughly three years after the peak of the public health crisis.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 68 points 10 months ago

Good.

Now do all the businesses who received funds and used them for stock buy-backs or managment bonuses instead.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 44 points 10 months ago

Anyone who defrauded these programs should receive the maximum sentence allowed plus restitution debt that follows them to the grave.

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

If the Dems lose the presidency this is dead in the water.

[-] cameron@lemmy.plaseo.org 26 points 10 months ago

Where can I report fraud like this?

[-] popproxx@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

There was almost no oversight on loans being given out. One of my businesses had a fraudulent ppp loan taken out on it. Not only was it a weed dispensary but had already burned down in a fire before the loan was approved. I contacted everyone I could to notify them about the fraud, FBI, sba, local police. It was devastating to get a letter in the mail out of knowwhere from the sba asking for payments on 135k. About had a heart attack. They took our name off the list and we don't have to pay, so somewhat of a happy ending.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 25 points 10 months ago

The number seemed really small, but in the article it says:

The Justice Department said Wednesday that it had filed charges or at least launched investigations related to roughly $8.6 billion in alleged coronavirus aid fraud since the start of the pandemic. That included hundreds of new cases, pleas, sentences and other developments secured as part of an enforcement campaign it ramped up from May through July.

Which is better, but still not close to enough. I remember the reports coming out years ago that said:

...participating in what experts say is the theft of as much as $80 billion — or about 10 percent — of the $800 billion handed out in a Covid relief plan known as the Paycheck Protection Program, or PPP. That’s on top of the $90 billion to $400 billion believed to have been stolen from the $900 billion Covid unemployment relief program — at least half taken by international fraudsters

[-] AttackBunny@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

It’s maddening that there was so much fraud, while legitimate businesses often got very little or no help at all. There were SO many hoops to jump through for PPP/EIDL I really don’t understand how all these “companies” were able to get money. They wanted payroll reports, tax filings, licenses that are easily verifiable online. Ffs the first round of PPP we couldn’t get anything because first the banks had “exhausted all their funds” on all their “whale” clients. In our case our bank was out of funds before the application was even online to apply with. Or if you had a certain business structure (totally legit, mind you) they didn’t have a backup plan for 1 form they required. The see so many consumers so angry about PPP loans being forgiven, but I feel like most of those people don’t realize the actual small businesses typically got screwed both ways. As a small business and as a consumer.

[-] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago

The answer is banks. Banks helped them get money and it was more profitable for the banks to assist wealthier customers first.

[-] AttackBunny@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Oh, yeah, I totally know WHY it happened. It guess I worded it wrong. Why was it allowed to happen would be a more accurate question, but I know the answer to that too. Trump and government as a whole being bought and paid for.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Republicans specifically refused to sign anything if it had any sort of oversight. They would only sign something that had no government oversight. We knew from day 1 exactly what would happen.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I have a friend who was working at a bank for small business loans. He said it was a massive clusterfuck. There were no instructions, no one knew what to do, so they first just started gathering info so they could put the PPP applications when they did have direction, then that was all useless or something when the rules finally came in, and then it was all gone.

Definitely a mix of corruption for inside tracks, and bad communication which made prioritizing the largest applications first while everyone honest was scrambling to try to get people help in the chaos.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The article is about individuals being charged. Businesses are not listed as being investigated or charged.

[-] AttackBunny@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

There’s mention of the PPP loans (the ones that were forgiven) which means the people being charged are related to fake businesses or businesses that lied. Govt isn’t going to go after a business, but they will definitely go after the person that signed their name on the dotted line.

[-] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago
[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Cool, will they include Governor Kay Ivey who used relief funds to build prisons?

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
267 points (99.6% liked)

News

21721 readers
5214 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS