this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
90 points (97.9% liked)

News

21865 readers
4099 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Insurers say prior authorization helps control costs by preventing medically unnecessary care, but patients say the process can delay or deny access to needed treatments.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (4 children)

We need nationalized healthcare. Now. There are 32 developed nations on earth. 31 of them have nationalized healthcare options. We are the only country that does not.

Why are conservatives (and neo-liberals) so opposed to modern healthcare?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

"I know my job makes the world a worse place and my boss treats me like trash, I wish I could just quit and pursue my own dreams, but I need health insurance!"

[–] Retix@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

There are, unfortunately, many people who only get enjoyment out of other people's jealousy. They are proud that they have "good" insurance that covers everything, in the same way they are proud of their expensive house/car/boat/etc. If everyone has that thing, they aren't special and it isn't a cool toy because anyone could

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it's because it'd end a lot of jobs and moneymaking opportunities. Imagine all those huge insurance companies just... not being needed the day nationalized healthcare happens. What about all those administrators who fill out the paper work in doctor's offices?

OTOH, it might also be what's needed to cool down the job market in the US.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Lot of typewriter repair jobs got ended by the advent of computers but we didn't let that stop us, we shouldn't protect obvious economic inefficiencies like this just to reward already affluent people

[–] HooPhuckenKarez@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

You're bullshit opinion is why I can't find a decent, locally made, buggy whip.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

I'm just saying that one thing most politicians do not want to be seen to do is get rid of any jobs. This is why it's hard to get traction with it - it'll hurt them politically directly(people think nationalized health care is worse or bad), it'll hurt their campaigns (cause contributions), and it'll hurt them on "the economy" because they "killed lots of good jobs".

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Prior authorization" is bullshit. You know what kind of prior authorization you need for a procedure or prescription? The doctor fucking ordering it.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love needing to get 'prior' authorization once a year to continue taking the same medication I have taken for the last decade.

No, I don't want to try the ones that don't work again just because they look similar on your spreadsheet.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

What I like is having to get "prior authorization" for an antidepressant that I've been taking for years, and then I run out because it's the weekend and nobody can get hold of anybody for anything.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Haha. Succinct.

[–] RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I'm sure there's plenty of examples but I'm going to share one from my work experience.

We had a patient who survived a really bad car accident but their jaw was broken in 4 (four) places. One of those cases when the doctor will wire your mouth shut leaving a small hole for the straw so you can drink your soup for the next x weeks.

The patient had a facial reconstructive surgery coming and their surgeon ordered an MRI of their jaw to see where the pieces were before cutting them open. The patient, unfortunately, had one of those cheapo insurance plans that were provided by their employer. Said insurance denied the MRI authorization 3 (three!) times due to "lack of medical necessity". It took us literal hours of arguing with that arsehole adjustor and their supervisors on the phone until they finally approved it.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The federal government has proposed ways to reform prior authorization that would require insurance companies to provide more transparency about denials and to speed up their response times.

So insurance companies can keep doing the same bullshit, they just need to send you more meaningless fine print about it more quickly. Gee, thanks Biden administration.

If finalized, those federal changes [wouldn't ] be implemented [until] 2026.

Ok, I already said my sarcastic "thanks," you can stop making it worse now.

But even then, the rules would apply only to some categories of health insurance, including Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid plans, but not employer-sponsored health plans. That means roughly half of all Americans wouldn’t benefit from the changes.

Ffs