this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
2931 points (98.2% liked)

Piracy: źœ±į“€ÉŖŹŸ į“›Źœį“‡ ŹœÉŖÉ¢Źœ źœ±į“‡į“€źœ±

53849 readers
660 users here now

āš“ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules ā€¢ Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


šŸ’° Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

Iā€™m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. šŸ˜Š I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[ā€“] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

we should've have called those things AI either but when it's a cacaodemon in the early 1990s it's more obvious to everyone that the computer isn't actually thinking

[ā€“] Saeculum@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We did call those things AI back when they were being developed. It's just that advancements in AI that become immediately useful tend to get a different name.

[ā€“] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

there was no ambiguity between a tree and AGI like the marketing pukes are pushing today