Technology

35124 readers

156 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

340

Microsoft might want to be making Windows 12 a subscription OS, suggests leak (www.neowin.net)

submitted 1 year ago by meiko60@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.ml

193 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

didn't they say windows 10 was going to be the last version of windows? hence why they jumped to the number 10 as it's nice and round.

[–] AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought they jumped to it because ancient, poorly made software would check for Windows 9* to cover 95 and 98, and could now potentially catch windows 9 as well

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Java was one of those poorly made software, but it seems stupid to program a check like that. What's the chance that after Windows 98, Microsoft would release Windows 99? The check should just used the version number. If Windows 95 was 4.0 and Windows 98 was 4.1 should have done the check as "4.*" as a future compatible version could have been 4.2 (win me was 4.9) while one with so many changes that it might need a newer version of the app could have been 5.0 (windows 2000)

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I said it was going to by my last version of Windows. Coincidence?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, but they've always been liars.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No the company itself never said it

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they used 10 because 7 was build 7xxx, 8 was build 8xxx, and 8.1 was 9xxx, making at least the initial versions of 10 10xxx.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

IMHO that's a coincidence of the build counter. 7 was 7600, 8 was 9200 and 8.1 was 9600. Then they changed how often they redo a build, so now it's over 23000

But at the time of win 10 release I saw on Twitter a screenshot of a decompiled ancient Java setup that did a check "if Windows 9*"...

Can't find that again