this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
142 points (89.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35295 readers
1680 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The sidewalks are really dangerous where I am, where they are super uneven, have "artistic" curves, and trees that are overhanging really low so like will hit my body.

I go max 15 MPH on my escooter and if I hear a ding ding I jump onto the sidewalk and go a bit slower until you guys pass, since I'm slower and can dismount easier it only makes sense for me to make room. I figure as long as I make room it "shouldn't" be a problem.

But just wondering if there are any bike riders that are just like shaking their fist at escooter riders.

EDIT: USA!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Please ride in the bike lane, not the sidewalk. Go whatever speed feels safe for you.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Not only do I agree on the basis of everyone's safety, but I WANT to see crowded bike lanes. Because eventually, I'd like bike lanes to replace cars, and outgrowing infrastructure is a basic part of expanding and changing it.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

i love crowded bike lanes (well, multi-use paths in sweden) next to slower roads, because it gives me the justification for biking on the road.

[–] Resistentialism@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

As someone who doesn't ride bicycles. What's the huge issue with cars? They're a ton more effective than bikes.

I think motorised vehicle owners and cyclists just have a universal hate for each other. Well, a lot of people do. There's a ton of people on bikes that are absolute cunts, and that comes from bad experiences with them.

Maybe if we all use the things how we're supposed to, a lot of this hate would disappear.

Edit: Thinking about it, as someone who rides a motorbike, some car drivers are just as bad. I've genuinely noticed that actual licenced motorbike riders tend to be the best out of them all. My main asking point was that you can't really do a full weeks worth of shopping with anything other than a car. U less you get it delivered.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not ideological or personal. Cars are just a terribly inefficient mode of transit with a lot of negatives. They cause a lot of preventable deaths, they take up an excess of land, and they limit our ability to move around and enjoy cities.

[–] Resistentialism@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't really say they're terribly inefficient. They've got a lot of practical uses.

And I wouldn't say cars themselves cause the deaths. Its the dickheads who drive the cars. Much like how a push biker, who looked like he was about to stop at some light that he was supposed at, decided to just go faster and swerve straight in front me, causing me panic, slip my bike into neutral when I wanted second, put on my revs whilst being in neutral, then having to aggressively throw my bike to the left, just so that I wouldn't plow straight into him. This cause me to have to the thread the needle between him and another push biker who I could've easily hit as well. If I were in my car, chances are I would've clipped either of them, and it would've been their fault. Not the cars.

Whilst they can take up a lot of space, it should be important to know that quite a lot of the time, cars here drive over roads that would've originally been planned for horse and carriages. And only really just adapted for cars. You can see that on UK country roads.

Do you mind me asking where you're from? I haven't really seen anything like the last point where I'm from. Quite a few places are pedestrians and push bikes only. With very few exceptions. That could also be because you rarely see big cars here. This also applies to taking up excessive land.

I do believe that public transport should be a lot better. I live in a small village about 10 miles from the nearest city. And I work in the city centre. My only options are either pray that a bus actually shows up and isn't late, or take my car to the tiny not really built for cars alley and risk scraping it. The other issue with public transport is, if I have to try to get to the very back of a bus, and pray that no one sits near me, or sit in a place I will feel extremely uncomfortable with. Both of these options mean that I need to have something I can squeeze the shit out. And shelter myself in and try to be as invisible as possible. I do not have these issues with cars or motorbikes. Cars because I'm in my own personal space where I feel a ton more comfortable, and the bike where it lets me hide the entirety of my body, again, making me feel a lot more comfortable.