409
submitted 11 months ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/1874605

A 17-year-old from Nebraska and her mother are facing criminal charges including performing an illegal abortion and concealing a dead body after police obtained the pair’s private chat history from Facebook, court documents published by Motherboard show.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sapient_cogbag@infosec.pub 58 points 11 months ago

I get very frustrated with the people who side with the govt here because it was a 7 month foetus. Just because it is 7 months rather than 5 or 6 doesn't suddenly mean the government should be able to coerce the use of someone's body as an incubator against their will.

Feels like people just don't give a shit about bodily autonomy and such :/ nya

[-] astromd@beehaw.org 11 points 11 months ago

I think the argument is that at 7 months that’s a viable human and it has rights on its own.

[-] KlausVonLechland@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago

That's a separate discussion on its own as for some 1 second old human is one with their own rights. But then in Belarus there is a lot of things that are illegal and we consider normal, like saying your leader is corrupt. Should META comply just because it is local law?

At the end of the day it seems we just can not trust anything that isn't encrypted.

[-] rs5th@beehaw.org 18 points 11 months ago

Jumping in here to say that I don’t feel like the Technology community is the right place to have the debate on the gestational limits for abortion. Let’s keep the focus on technology please.

[-] KlausVonLechland@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago

That's true but that's the problem with technology where law is involved is always the same, law is made by people and their opinions, gestation limit is just secondary thing here really and I wasn't interested in discussing that (I'm strongly pro-choice but as someone said... "We live in a society").

Facebook will also open and hand out your private messages in many other cases, I remember this case about drugs and whatnot: https://www.govtech.com/public-safety/warrant-for-encrypted-facebook-messages-causes-privacy-worry.html but I don't know how this specific case ended.

What is worth to note is at the start they give the justification as fight against cartels, exploiters and terrorists but if that is their concern the law should be pointing out these 3 specific things and not used to catch teenagers smoking weed. And also how words like "encryption" and "security" and "private" turn out to be nothing more than marketing buzzwords.

Funny how abuse of power by the state makes normal people move to the apps used by "shaddy people" for extra privacy only to get in fact the normal level of privacy a normal person would expect to get.

I think we should first change the law and using end-to-end encryption is only stopgap measure.

In Poland Pegasus was simply used by ruling party to hack phones of the people they don't like: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/polish-mayor-targeted-by-pegasus-spyware-media-2023-03-03/

How you can even defend yourself against this? From thechnological standpoint we can try this or that but encroaching legislative changes will sooner or later push us against the wall. At the end of the day if law allows they will phisically take your device and phisically make you give them access and even if you install killswitch they simply will make it illegal and give you 5 years just for having it on your device.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
409 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
58 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS