this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
99 points (97.1% liked)

Memes

45130 readers
1802 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That argument will be thrown at every god damn step we make towards a better planet. It's not valid.

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Electric cars will not save the planet. Electric cars will save the car industry.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But they're a whole lot better for the planet than gas cars. And cars won't go away till we make alternatives. Which we should do as quickly as possible, but will still take a while.

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 1 points 11 months ago

It's not good enough. Cars are a bigger problem than their immediately obvious issues like pollution.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that the real way to cut down on emissions would be to accept that not every good can be available at any time and that's a bitter pill to swallow.

We have tuna caught in South America, hauled to Thailand for canning and hauled back to the US to be sold. Turns more profit than local catches because the megacorporations can save a couple bucks on worker salaries. And that is just an example, it's not just the food industry, hauling shit to hell and back and back to hell and back is common practice.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Doesn't even have to be unavailable at times. They could can it in north America if they wanted to. Outsourcing jobs (read: exploiting foreign countries and their workers) should be heavily taxed if not banned in most industries

[–] arlaerion@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

You mean exploiting, right? :)