Privacy

29872 readers

2603 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

387

Meta (Facebook / Instagram) to move to a "Pay for your Rights" approach (noyb.eu)

submitted 9 months ago by elvith@feddit.de to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta plans to move to a "Pay for your Rights" model, where EU users will have to pay $ 168 a year (€ 160 a year) if they don't agree to give up their fundamental right to privacy on platforms such as Instagram and Facebook. History has shown that Meta's regulator, the Irish DPC, is likely to agree to any way that Meta can bypass the GDPR. However, the company may also be able to use six words from a recent Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling to support its approach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I feel like there is a balance to this.

I hate all the stuff Facebook/Meta has done, but a service from a for-profit company will have a cost.
At the same time, if you make the cost so excessive that no one will actually go for it, it's not really an alternative and rather a loophole for the law.

What makes more sense is to set the price point around equal to the amount made / user. I REALLY doubt that they are making $168 from each person per year.

I don't have the data with me, but would a quick and dirty total_revenue/total_users give a good estimate? Assuming total_revenue doesn't include other products like devices

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

in 2022, they made US$113bn from ads. They have approx 3bn users so thats about US$38 per user per year.

[–] ribboo@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No one is saying they shouldn’t be allowed to run ads. But that they should be allowed to run highly specific and targeted ads is not by any means a forgone conclusion.

Television, newspapers, ads out in the “wild” and whatnot. All manage without individualizing ads. And Facebook could as well. But it’s more profitable to say to hell with our users privacy, let’s individualize the shit out of those ads.

That’s the problem.