Lemmy

12438 readers

2 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

nutomic@lemmy.ml

would it be simpler for people if we said "server" instead of "instance"? (programming.dev)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Die4Ever@programming.dev to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

or maybe some other terminology would be better? lots of people get confused when you ask them to choose an instance, sometimes I think even the word "proxy", "host", or "hub" is simpler

the specific terms aren't my point, just a discussion to see if we can come up with a better name

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure about changing the terminology, but if we did, I think it should be a word that implies what the situation is: That the instance they pick isn't a walled garden in itself, but just an access point to the wider connected Lemmyverse. I think that was a common confusion point for most of us when we first heard of Lemmy.

So... "access point"? Or "gateway"? Or for a milder change, going from "instance" to "default instance" might get the point across.

[–] Die4Ever@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

if we wanted to keep the word instance then yea "default instance" isn't bad, or maybe "home instance"

[–] ram 4 points 11 months ago

"Home instance" is the terminology I use.

[–] marius851000@lemmy.mariusdavid.fr 2 points 11 months ago

Matrix use the term of "homeserver" too