this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

6938 readers
746 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ‘’ Lifestylecoming soon


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Other


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here:

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No porn.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Good move, hope they stand their ground on this decision.

Developers definitely should not be compensated if the land was bought at the same value it was/is.

[–] SwampTerror@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They will likely sue, which will mean we pay again.

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

They better get sued by the original owners in turn. And then those owners will sue the government so we can pay again. The circle of jerk.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Sue for what? They bought some land. That land is in their possession.

I don't think a corrupt backroom deal falling through is grounds for damages.