this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
112 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

70922 readers
3508 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As a guy closing in on 50, losing my near vision really annoys me. And the current solutions are weak at best, which annoys me even more. These and the other companies working on similar sound great. But someone tell me why I would need a prescription for them? And is that true in the EU? The article makes it sound like getting them approved to be prescribed is a big hurdle. They seem like better reading glasses, which I don't need a prescription to buy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks but I dont want specs thatneed charging or can “crash”

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I don't either but I sure would like to be able to read stuff sometimes.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

multifocals areyour friend then

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is that the same as Progressives? I have them. I hate the areas that don't work on the sides. People get used to them I guess, but I don’t have to wear mine most of the time. And even if you are used to it, that means you have some distorted peripheral vision when you wear them.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

They can be depending on your vision issues. Mine are essentially bifocals where the reading portion isn't visible. If I focus there's a tiny fuzzy line where the readers meet the normal lens.

To be honest I wasn't aware of the sides issue and it seems you might have different problem that requires a third lens.