this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
510 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

70080 readers
2968 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 131 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Clearly most people care more about other factors than they do about audio quality that isn't even discernable through their Bluetooth earbuds.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah seriously; unless you're an audiophile who spends extra on quality headphones, your Bluetooth buds are probably using the SBC codec, which cuts off frequencies at 16kHz and thus is hardly better than listening to a 128Kbps MP3. (In Android you can see what codec your headphones are using by going into the developer options.)

And to be honest, if you care enough about sound quality to spend extra on the high res tier in your streaming service of choice, you're probably using wired headphones. Audiophiles don't fuck with Bluetooth.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 48 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

i dumped spotify because they raised the price so they could include podcasts that i couldn't give less of a rat's ass about. also the ai bullshit and the refusal to allow me to block artists. spotify can get fucked

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Streaming sites not including the option to block content is frustrating.

I remember when Netflix let you hide individual movies so they didn't clutter up the categories. When it was removed there was a rumor that giving it a low score would hide it but that never worked for me. Don't even remember the other services offering an option to hide stuff.

Really wish that option was common.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You can still do that on YouTube.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think of youtube as a streaming site for some reason. Maybe because I only interact with it on a computer and the others through TVs even though everything can go through both.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 hours ago

They also have movies, but I figured "buying" them over there is more expensive than getting DVDs or sometimes even BluRays shipped from UK to Slovakia via Amazon.

Random example: Blade Runner 2049 bought from seller RAREWAVES for €5.64 ($6.30 currently) incl. shipping, the DVD itself being £2.24 ($2.97 currently). It was new, not used.
"Renting" on YouTube for 48 hours within 30 days is $3.99, while "Buying" is $14.99.

Seems like I could get it used in "Very Good" condition on BluRay for around €6. Just UHD BluRay is more expensive than YouTube.

[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Raised the price for podcasts, raised the price for audiobooks. Guys, I just want a music service…

Then as you mentioned…no ability to block artists or songs. I honestly believe that not listening to a particular song by an artist you otherwise like made it show up even more in radio/shuffle play. Can’t you guys clue into the fact that I skip that track EVERY time you start playing it.

People made alternate desktop clients to customize the homepage cause they were unwilling. The mobile app wasn’t so lucky. Again…my home page doesn’t need to be podcasts, audio books and artists I’ve never listened to but are obviously being boosted by paid promotions.

When they started throwing up full page dialog popups recommending the most ridiculous not even close to what I listen to content multiple times a listening session…I was out. Didn’t just cancel premium, deleted the account and uninstalled the apps. I’m not paying you to actively annoy the shit out of me.

Edit: before people mention the ‘hide this song’ feature. That wasn’t always a thing and is fatally flawed. It just blocks the song on that one album/playlist. If it’s a popular song it’s on who knows how many compilation albums, etc. I’m not gonna go block the same song 10+ times. Heaven forbid it has covers I don’t want to hear either…

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I never moved from pandora to Spotify and could never find a good reason to.

I realize I’m a decade out of the loop, but what did it do better?

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

i never used pandora--is it true you can't make your own playlists? that would be a no go for me. i switched to tidal and have no complaints

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Pandora was initially antithetical to playlists, the concept was utilizing the music genome project to play songs that are like songs you’ve liked, intelligent radio.

Playlists probably was the thing Spotify had that pandora didn’t have that made Spotify get big, you can make playlists now.

I only use pandora because it’s music discovery is so good tbh.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Playlists? The reason people use Spotify is you can play the individual song or album that you want and you can’t with Pandora. That’s the key difference. Not playlists lol

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not entirely sure how selecting the song or songs you want to listen to differs from a playlist, but ok.

I think the concept of a playlist is exactly what you’re describing.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I fundamentally misunderstood the term I guess lol I was reading it as being able to make playlists (like broadly? If that makes sense) as some sort of key feature.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 21 hours ago

I think generally it is the key feature.

Internet radio existed before pandora came along, pandora was novel in that it implemented the music genome project. The idea of the user selecting the next song was counter to their intent.

Playlists, and/or the user selecting their songs wasn’t exactly novel except for the free2play model w/ads allowing its widespread adoption.

IMO pandora paved the way for the commercial viability of Spotify, now pandora has playlists and you can select individual songs and albums. I still use it just for the music discovery

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 22 hours ago

it's the social features and the network effect. if you want to make a playlist and share it with your friends the easiest way to get them to listen to it is to host it on spotify. also blends, collaborative playlist, jams, and now listening all provide the illusion of connection through a shared listening experience. and it's not so much that these things are better than what we used to have for sharing music, it's that corporations have all killed our ways of sharing music. that's what they really hated about groove shark. artists made more money in the groove shark era, but umg, sony, and warner didn't control how we shared on it.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 0 points 17 hours ago

Just switched from iPhone to Android. If your Bluetooth headphones support aptx you can definitely hear the difference