Canada

Yeah it would have been more appropriate to say "Chinese-speaking audiences" on my part, especially given the concern seems to be that it was aimed at Canadian voters who can read/speak the language.

The second link was definitely the one I was more referring to when talking about editorializing and characterizations, it's more emotive language overall but it still doesn't really say anything wrong or misleading. Disagreeing with the characterization could be reasonable, but the tone of it is like any sensationalized news aggregator blog or social media account anywhere else in the world. Like we don't call it misinformation when people post a video called "[Public Figure] DESTROYED in HEATED DEBATE!" even if we roll our eyes at the language, and similarly any kind of social media format lends itself to catchier and more dramatic descriptions.

The lack of attribution could actually be the real source of concern. It's possible there's some disagreements on wording in a translation, or that not having direct links to sources is viewed as misleading but again... it's not hard to see that's exactly how just about any social media news account tends to function these days.

It just honestly feels like this is the Canadian government grasping at straws, especially given that this is being treated like overt election interference from the Chinese government. Given that there is a much more present and obvious concern about US interference. Most of our media outside the CBC and all of our social media is directly owned by US corporations that are backing the fascist threatening to annex us. I don't understand why the fed and CSIS keep issuing these warnings about often dubious claims of malicious state actors from elsewhere, it's maddening.