this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
533 points (94.8% liked)
hopeposting
1282 readers
4 users here now
Proof of the indomitable human spirit.
Rules:
- Posts must inspire hope or highlight the beauty of existence
- Posts and comments harassing or antagonizing a real person will be removed
- Posts mentioning religious topics are allowed but religion should not be the main point of the post. E.g. “God’s beautiful world” is fine because of the “beautiful world” part, but “God loves you” isn’t because religion is the focal point
- Posts and comments judging group of people in negative way based on stereotype will be removed.
- No posts with toxic positivity. All human emotions are valid.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No ones going to mention this is obviously horse shit?
Like there's so much wrong with this story I'm sure where to begin, like they will have produced ammunition in the 100s of thousands, did they write a note in like 1 in 20, or did they just get extremely lucky?
Where did they fund the shells? They either would have gone in one side and out the other, or they would have just disintegrated, especially if they were hollow.
The explosive filled in these shells is fairly significant amount of their mass. Did the Nazis running the factories not notice when the cases of ammunition are 20% lighter than they should be and the workers have several tonnes of explosive filler left over? Was there no quality control in the factories at all?
Why would they just start cutting open shells they presume are high explosive?
This 1,000% didn't happen.
I'm not saying it happened, but it is a "known" story. Example: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2023/12/28/all-we-can-do-for-you-now-how-czech-sabotage-saved-a-b-17-crew/
It's an apocryphal story.
It looks like the source is a memoir written by a soldier. So I guess you'd have to take that one guy's word for it, assuming interviews etc. with other people who would have seen the same event don't exist.
I err on the side of people, especially people from generations prior to being able to verify a lot of stuff on the internet, being entirely full of shit.
This is the same kind of logic that would say 9/11 is fake because one of the terrorists' ID cards was found unscathed in a New York street.
I'm not saying it happened, but your skepticism is way out of proportion.
Is this the first you're hearing of Nazi weapons factories? Because yeah, QA/QC was nearly non-existent
Nothing you didn't see has ever happened. Its the vibe I'm getting.
Edit: Dropped a Y
Not really - the explosive charge is less than half an ounce when the whole shell (the projectile part, not including the cartridge casing and the propellant) is about 3.5 ounces. So the explosive charge is about 10% of the weight of the shell.
The entire cartridge weighs about 11 ounces, so a cartridge with an empty charge cavity would be only about 2-3% lighter than normal. A case would also include the belt(s) and the weight of the box, so a case of sabotaged cartridges would be almost imperceptibly lighter than normal, with a difference probably less than 1%.
I agree that story is likely bullshit, but not for that particular reason. I don't see why workers would risk calling added attention to their sabotage by putting little notes into each shell - not to mention the writer's cramp this would produce.
That depends on what size she'll were talking about right? Like I assume we're talking about plane mounted 20mm here, but if it was flak 88 shell or something that would be much higher percentage explosive filler, although a direct hit with a flak 88 would be very rare.
This is why you Always report images of text with no transcription or citations.
Mods, please delete this misinformation
It gets really bad when you realize that people treat this kind of bullshit with the same relative importance to their lives AND skepticism as they treat their democratic political decisions and stances that actually impact us all.