this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)
Programming
18127 readers
466 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No. I think that macro functionality is useful, but I don't do it via the physical keyboard.
My general take is that chording (pressing some combination of keys simultaneously) that lets one keep one hands on the home row is faster than pressing one key. So, like, instead of having separate capital and lowercase letter keys, it's preferable to have "shift" and just one key.
I think that the main arguments for dedicated keys that one lifts one hands for would be for important but relatively-infrequently-used keys that people don't use enough to remember chorded combinations for -- you can just throw the label on the button as a quick reference. Like, we don't usually have Windows-Alt-7 on a keyboard power on a laptop, but instead have a dedicated power button.
Maybe there's a use to have keyboard-level-programmed macros with chording, as some keyboards can do...but to me, the use case seems pretty niche. If you're using multiple software environments (e.g. BIOS, Windows, Linux terminal, whatever) and want the same functionality in all of them (e.g. a way to type your name), that might make some sense. Or maybe if you're permitted to take a keyboard with you, but are required to use a computer that you can't configure at the software level, that'd provide configurability at a level that you have control over.
In general, though, I'm happier with configuring stuff like that on the computer's software; I don't hit those two use cases, myself.