this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
595 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60106 readers
1923 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm rather curious to see how the EU's privacy laws are going to handle this.

(Original article is from Fortune, but Yahoo Finance doesn't have a paywall)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cloudless@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not impossible, it is just expensive.

[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, its actually basically impossible unless you remake the entire thing.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So remake the entire thing.

If they did something the wrong way, being hard to change or redo doesn't mean they get a free pass to keep doing it wrong.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's what the law requires then the AI companies will just move somewhere else and that jurisdiction will miss out on the next industrial revolution.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm fine with that if the cost of it would be loss of privacy. I think there's some situations where an invasion of privacy can be justified, such as legitimately trying to find online pedos.

But giving up my privacy to a corporation in an irreversible way so they can make millions? Absolutely not.