this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
125 points (99.2% liked)

Canada

7311 readers
559 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The House of Commons is days from passing Bill S-210, a dangerously broad age verification bill that would put an age lock on most of Canada's Internet and threaten every Canadian’s privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I read the bill and came across this in section 11:

Before prescribing an age-verification method under subsection (1), the Governor in Council must consider whether the method

(a) is reliable;

(b) maintains user privacy and protects user personal information;

(c) collects and uses personal information solely for age-verification purposes, except to the extent required by law;

(d) destroys any personal information collected for age-verification purposes once the verification is completed; and

(e) generally complies with best practices in the fields of age verification and privacy protection.

Do I think this is a good bill or a necessary bill? No.

Do I think it can be abused to block a wide swath of sites? Yes.

Does it necessarily lead to that as the OP article suggests? No.

Does it put people on a list that can be leaked? In principle it should not.

Will it make it more difficult for smaller websites like lemmy.ca to host? Possibly, but most likely not, as it can operate as normal until the government gives the server admins an official notice.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Does it put people on a list that can be leaked? In principle it should not.

Yet it almost certainly will.

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The fact that it must be collected at all is the problem. I have very little faith that the government will actually choose a privacy preserving solution, and even if they do, I doubt it'll be implemented perfectly.