this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
230 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
59086 readers
3496 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I looked at Centurylink's "compatible" modems and they're all rated 3.5 stars and cost $150+ or more.
The next best thing is satellite at $100 for 30Mps, versus 200Mps for $40 for CenturyLink, or Comcast.
I'll give CenturyLink a chance because I really hate Comcast. But God I wish there was more competition.
This exact scenario is what starlink is for
I can definitely believe that Comcast can manage to be more horrible than CenturyLink. Not an easy task though.
Don't go with satellite if you care about latency at all. (From what I know, it also tends to have pretty pitiful upload speeds.)
I had their service for 6-7 years and I have to admit I never had an issue with the modem (and the service was generally reliable with little downtime). Their customer service though...