this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
54 points (89.7% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
433 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It means n^x^, where nb is a fixed constant and X is the variable we're interested in. By contrast, damage to roads is proportional to x^4^, which is not exponential.

[โ€“] asret@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks. That helps. I guess I'm just used to less precise usage, whether something is linear, greater than linear (exponential) or less than linear (logarithmic). I don't often hear people talk about polynomial growth.

[โ€“] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 13 hours ago

Yeah I've seen the less precise usage before. I push back on it whenever I can, because the difference between exponential growth and quadratic or quartile growth is pretty significant. But it's especially bad in a context like this where someone specifically asked in what manner something scales, which is a question that (to my mind) clearly indicates a desire for the specific nature of the growth, particularly given the well-known quadratic growth of air resistance with velocity and the less (but still kinda) well-known quartic growth of damage to roads with axel weight.