this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
213 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
60033 readers
2795 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've been giving static site generators a go, specifically Hugo. Webdevs have always treated static sites as unserious, but there's plenty of sites out there where it'd be ideal. An awful lot of those sites are currently on WordPress.
Does your local mechanics shop need a dynamic site? No. Local restaurant that points you to an external site for online ordering? No. Little gift shop selling locally produced goods? If they don't intend to sell online, then no. A manufacturer with product pages that have a "where to buy" button that sends you to their sales partner in your country? Nope.
How many CPU cycles are wasted on these sites that could be nothing more than reading a file and streaming it back to the client?
This is a very good point. The other issue is security. The little mechanic shop that has no dynamic content, technically should be static pages, so when it's left alone and not updated for 3 years it doesn't get hacked by some WordPress vulnerability.