Asklemmy

44151 readers

1317 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

-34

Why are there so many people supporting racism on Lemmy? (lemm.ee)

submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Social_Discussion@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

With my recent post I was trying to ask if there are other people like me who also feel that people seem to focus more and more on skin color and ethnicity in an unhealthy and obsessive way and I thought I'd find some people agreeing with me who also feel uncomfortable and stressed out by this.

But instead the overwhelming response was people trying to justify racism instead of agreeing that it's a bad thing and needs to end. As if they were trying to use every possible argument to bash on me and justify racism.

Why could it be the case that so many people here on Lemmy support racism? In my opinion there is no reason to discriminate someone based on their looks PERIOD!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Metostopholes@midwest.social 21 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure that 100% of the people here and in the earlier thread agree that people are intrinsically equal, regardless of their skin color. It sounds like you think that because of this, anyone who supports any situation where people are treated differently based on ethnicity, skin color, etc is racist.

Let me try a metaphor.

Let's say there was a group of people with all different skin tones. They are all going to be given money, but because the people running the organization giving out the money are racist, they give much more to people with light skin, and much less to people with dark skin. The people running the organization are replaced with people who are not racist, but it takes generations. The people with less money had to spend it all on food and shelter, and their descendants have none of it. The people who got more money spent some on food and shelter and had lots left over, which they put in a bank and got a lot of interest from it. It was given to their children, and their children's children, and now their descendants have even more money.

It was definitely racist to originally give more money to the lighter skinned people.

Would it be racist to now give more money to the darker skinned people?

[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

do half of a mayocide
1.488 seconds after half the honkeys are gone, turn around to face the other honkeyhalf
"it was in the past, you need to move forward"

it's gonna be the best bit ever

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

Perfect analogy

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

Would it be racist to now give more money to the darker skinned people?

From my perspective, yes.

The redistribution of the generational wealth should be adressed as well by politics but that should be independent of the racism discussion. Significantly unequal distribution of money due to inheritance is more and more dividing society. But I don't care if the rich people have a lighter or darker tan.

If you target inequality with inequality in the opposite direction, you're just feeding rightwing narratives IMO.