this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
74 points (72.3% liked)

Memes

45891 readers
1522 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He still banned being gay. He signed a law that made homosexuality punishable by five years imprisonment. Stalin is cancelled for being homophobic.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Tbf literally everyone before the 1970s is canceled for that.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago

No, not literally everyone. 10% of the population was gay back then, same as now. The institute of sexology in Germany was performing bottom surgery for trans women.

Homophobes want you to think gay acceptance is new, but it's not. There have always been people who could tell right from wrong. Stalin wasn't one of them.

[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

The argument isn't to say its better or good. Rather, it is arguing that all likely alternatives to said politician would show the same homophobia policy. So given a frame of reference of politicians of that time, their LGBT policy doesn't make them worse than realistic alternatives.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stalin didn’t ban being gay, because again, the USSR wasn’t a dictatorship. If the USSR did, that obviously sucks, but ostensibly democratic US and Britain have done worse.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He signed the law when it arrived on his desk. If he had been an ally, he wouldn't have signed it. Drag can't imagine Joe Biden signing a law like that, even if the house and senate approved it. Joe Stalin is held to the same standard by history.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

If he had been an ally, he wouldn’t have signed it.

can’t imagine Joe Biden signing a law like that

Bringing up 2024’s Biden is a non sequitur. We already went over this: no mid-20th century Western state was a gay ally.

Yeah Stalin still had issues and it was awful that the working theory at the time was homosexuality was a result of western decadence since literally all the rich people they found were doing weird sex stuff and Germany and the US killed all the gay communists and socialists they could and burned their books so there was no real example they could find of any 'deviance' being innate.

That all being said towards the end the crack down wire off and five years labor is still better than what any other country at the time did to cure the gays.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Hold up a minute, you are putting words in my mouth. I'm not even making any claims in my comment about how many Stalin killed or that he acted alone. Only the historically accurate fact that he is responsible for a significant amount of death and suffering, and that statistically it is impossible that everyone persecuted by the (Stalin lead) soviet government was innocent. You can argue numbers and western perception all you want but it is a historical fact that Stalin had the blood of innocent people on his hands, as many world leaders throughout history have had (including most if not all us presidents). Even if your claims are true it still doesn't invalidate my point.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online -4 points 1 week ago

Tankies see in monochrome, either he's genocidal or he's a socialist icon I guess