this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
73 points (90.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36154 readers
1142 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 20 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

We already have nuclear participation with the US. In case NATO decides for mutual nuclear defense, the US nuclear bombs stored in Germany exclusively for German use would be attached to airplanes of the German Air Force to be deployed onto their targets.

[–] sith@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And what if the orange man and his friend Putin differs?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There is still the Fr*nch sub's that Macron just offered to be a shared EU resource.

[–] sith@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And what happens if Le Pen wins the next election?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

About the same thing as if the AfD does.

We get fucked, my friend. And that's why establishing a shared EU army to pass the nukes to would be good for everyone.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's funny, after the breakup of USSR there existed for a few years such an entity as "CIS armed forces". It does not anymore because national governments want to control their own militaries.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

National governments don't give a fuck about their own armies until they need them. Ironically, most CIS countries needed their armies to defend against Russia.

EU countries can not wage wars against one other, armies or not, as everyone knows that the whole bloc's economy would crash instantly as soon as we stopped trading. If German tanks rolled across France again, their crews would starve, as would the French defenders before they could kill each other.

The only reasonable use for an army in modern Europe beyond imperialistic outings with the US to countries who deserve better is to defend against Russia (and maybe China).

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

France and the US are the only two NATO countries able to build nukes.

Theoretically the UK are able to build nukes too but not without US support.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Montebello Islands disagree.

You technically could build a nuke with enough enriched uranium. The recipe for a nuke is literally:

  • take half of the amount of the enriched uranium required
  • smash the other half into it
  • boom, Hiroshima.

You need a particular kind of nuclear reactor to create the enriched uranium, though. But for example in Ukraine, the Chornobyl reactor was built exactly for that.

That said, the US, the UK and France are the only three NATO countries allowed under international agreement to build nukes.

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You need a particular kind of nuclear reactor to create the enriched uranium

*plutonium. Enriched uranium comes from taking natural uranium and enriching the content of a specific isotope (235U), typically with centrifuges, gaseous diffusion and/or magnetic separation in a synchrotron. The enriched uranium can be used in a weapon, or it can be used as fuel for a nuclear reactor to make 239Pu from 238U.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks, my nuclear chemistry was a bit rusty.

[–] remon@ani.social 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not sure what you mean by "for German use". The US is very much in charge of every step of the use of shared nuclear weapons. Our pilots get to deliver them, that's pretty much all of our involvement.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What if the USA decides to side with Russia against Germany?

[–] EmbarrassedDrum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

well if the bombs are located inside Germany it's not all that simple

[–] sith@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good luck using them unless you're allowed to. Might be an option if you have a couple of months. Though you would have to defend against two nuclear powers during that time.

Also good luck using your US made jets and critical components.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure if Germany and the US were on so bad terms that they wouldn't be trading, Western civilization would just collapse. The NL of ASML fame is a very, very close German ally.

[–] sith@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I believe that with the new US administration (and US popular opinion), one could go from good terms to bad over night. I would not trust that the US adhere to article 5 if things become serious for real. Why should they start a nuclear war just because their semi-friend forces itself upon a woke central European country? Things were completely different during the cold War.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, you're thinking, what if the US invades Germany?

So you see, there is one reason we keep the French around beyond baguettes and wine, it's their ability to turn all major US cities into a radioactive wasteland regardless of what happens to the rest of the EU.

And the French are willing to do that and are obligated to beyond NATO as well.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well it actually is, terrifyingly so even.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

If Germany can't use the bomb without the US approbation then Germany does not have a nuclear bomb.

Germany does not have a credible deterrence.