397
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

ChatGPT generates cancer treatment plans that are full of errors โ€” Study finds that ChatGPT provided false information when asked to design cancer treatment plans::Researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital found that cancer treatment plans generated by OpenAI's revolutionary chatbot were full of errors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SolNine@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

GPT has been utter garbage lately. I feel as though it's somehow become worse. I use it as a search engine alternative and it has RARELY been correct lately. I will respond to it, telling it that it is incorrect, and it will keep generating even more inaccurate answers... It's to the point where it almost becomes entirely useless, where sometimes it used to find some of the correct information.

I don't know what they did in 4.0 or whatever it is, but it's just plain bad.

[-] Elderos@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah they basically killed it. I knew for a fact that it was way too good to be given like that to us common folks. I mean it still has some use cases, but its ability to "reason" about stuff or at least the illusion of it is basically gone.

[-] Legendsofanus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Can you give some recent use examples of this? I don't use CHATGPT anymore but I used to get my code written by it and many of my classmates still use it

[-] Elderos@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

I think it is still pretty decent at "coding", but it used that I could throw almost anything at it about virtually anything and most of the time there was no hallucinations if the prompt was good. It has always been prone to beong influenced by biased prompts so you had.to work around that.

Lately I feel like I really need to draw out answers out of it. You have to insist to get past the cookie-cutter reponses and all the newly added "I am not a specialist therefore I refuse to answer". Historical questions are often refused too if deemed offensives. But really, its been unable to give me all sort of general facts like it used too by lying about the cutoff date of 2021, even after being corrected and apologizing. Some answers are purely 100% hallucinations. Its never been perfect but it used to be better than googling, well not anymore imo. It is still probably decent for non-historical questions, like coding.

[-] SolNine@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

My experience mirrors this, though I don't use it for much beyond a specific use case... I'm wondering why they neutered it so much?

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
397 points (85.6% liked)

Technology

55643 readers
3766 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS