this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
664 points (80.7% liked)

memes

10663 readers
1782 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I for one have stopped posting any content to lemmy.ml communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

!asklemmy@lemmy.world has over 70 times as many subscribers as the other two asklemmy communities combined.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 38 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm avoiding linking lemmy.world instances. We shouldn't put even more eggs in that basket, you know.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 21 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

But maybe we shouldn't throw out the few eggs Lemmy does have.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Nobody is throwing eggs out. I'm recommending one basket instead of another, that's it.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah, it should be easier to grow ten communities about the same topic than one.

If you want to grow other instances, do it with unique stuff, not stuff .world already has. It's not like there no room left.

Get a game developer to start posting their stuff on your new instance. Get celebrities to start posting their AMAs somewhere. Get big newspapers to start their own instance.

Do something other than trying to kill the dozen successful Lemmy communities we do have. Federation is a feature, not a purpose, and it's already doing its job by making .ml less relevant for a good reason.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 7 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, it should be easier to grow ten communities about the same topic than one.

Yeah, because people don't totally cross-post stuff all the time, or subscribe to multiple comms around the same topic.

If you want to grow other instances, do it with unique stuff, not stuff .world already has. It’s not like there no room left.

If you're that pissed that I'm not listing .world comms, to the point of trying to boss me around (see emphasis on imperative), you can list yourself those comms. With blackjack and hookers.

Do something other than trying to kill the dozen successful Lemmy communities we do have.

Okay, full stop here. Cut off the crap - in no moment I'm trying to "kill" those communities in .world, and you're being a disingenuous liar (or worse, a bloody moron) for claiming otherwise.

Not going to waste my time further with you.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Do something other than trying to kill the dozen successful Lemmy communities we do have.

!showsandmovies@lemm.ee has twice the number of active users compared to !television@lemmy.world , still people won't move to it, keeping both communities active and preventing grow of a single community on that topic.

If you're so in favor of growing single communities on a topic, could you please consider redirecting to the lemm.ee community? It's not like LW is lacking in active communities

Same for !movies@lemm.ee and !movies@lemmy.world

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think you might have a bias.

Lemmy.World !television subscribers

Lemm.ee shows and movies subscribers

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd generally be in favor of some kind of cooperation agreement. I'd certainly promote the larger community over the smaller one.

We absolutely have allowed moderators to close and redirect their community off of LW..

[–] Blaze@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Just to make it sure, are you saying that it's not true that at this moment

[–] spacedout@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't this exact argument go for the few lemmy.ml eggs as well?

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, but it's a smaller issue than .ml's censorship issue.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 4 weeks ago

Did they suggest moving to the random.trsh website? This is still Lemmy, it's still federalized and non-corporate and decentralized.