this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7280 readers
138 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On a monthly basis, the New Housing Price Index (NHPI) fell 0.4% in October, the largest monthly decline since April 2009. However, the picture was mixed across the country, as prices were down in 9 out of 27 census metropolitan areas (CMAs) surveyed, but unchanged in 11 CMAs and up in the remaining 7.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If you think that's unaffordable, you should try renting which is always more expensive than owning.

[–] FlareHeart@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My current rent: $1600 (no utilities included).
Tenant insurance: $300 (per year!).
Tenant total: $1625 per month.

Mortgage calculation: $1863 per month for a $300,000 mortgage with a 10% down payment.
Property tax: ~$300 per month.
House insurance: ~$150 per month.
Mortgage total: $2313 per month.

And that is not even including the costs of repairs on the house. In my city a $300,000 house will be in need of some major repairs.

I'd say I'm doing pretty good. I am saving that extra $700 per month myself and am in a lot better of a position than if I was paying that mortgage.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Historically, that is not always true and very market dependent.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Historically when there were work houses and inns that cost under a days pay, sure. But anytime after the 19th century it's been true. Anywhere in the US in Canada for the last 150 years it's been true. Any SFH it's been true, including historically.

Landlords don't rent out of the kindness of their cold, dead, grease filled hearts, they rent to make a profit. Meaning it is always cheaper to own than rent because that profit is built into the rent.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Really?

As a homeowner, I've had to replace a roof, an A/C, furnace, driveway, shed, washer/dryer/oven/fridge, fencing, removed trees, and had indoor renovations done... Tens and tens of thousands.

That doesn't include any of the time and expense to maintain the property.

Unless renters have to cover expenses like that, I can't possibly see renting as more expensive.

I have kids who rent their own place, and while the rent is expensive, they never have these kinds of crazy expenses to deal with.

But I really don't want to get into an affordability pissing contest. Everything is expensive and unaffordable for the majority of the population.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Renters do cover expenses like that. Because they pay rent. And rent pays for all of that plus profit.