this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
394 points (97.6% liked)

Offbeat

1325 readers
1 users here now

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/ANMD5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You understand that the sham papers aren't uniformly distributed over journals, right? You understand that 8000 of them belonged to a single publisher and that thousands of fully legitimate papers are published every day? And that Science is – again – one of the most rigorous academic journals in the world? Just blanket denying science that you pretend to understand isn't going to help your floundering credibility.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

They do get cited in journals, most scientific work is based upon prior works. Many journals have had to redact stuff due to fake papers being cited, regardless of what you say.

Where did the 20% methane emissions over the past 5 years come from? Was there an explosion in the cattle industry?

Also the oil industry lies, they omit lots of data to make the industry look cleaner than it is. This is the most ideal scape goat for the industry, and would not surprise me.

Link the journals, I don't mind reading

https://news.mongabay.com/2024/05/canada-oil-sands-air-pollution-20-64-times-worse-than-industry-says-study/

https://environmentaldefence.ca/2023/02/28/no-more-excuses-oil-and-gas-companies-keep-lying-about-their-methane-emissions/

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/oil-gas-industry-lying-global-213549059.html?guccounter=1

https://www.nationalobserver.com/2024/05/31/opinion/Oil-industry-studies-CAPP-emissions-Alberta