this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
97 points (97.1% liked)

Asklemmy

44170 readers
1371 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The subjects that you can't even bring up without getting downvoted, banned, fired, expelled, cancelled etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Paedophilia as a sickness, especially non-offending paedos.

[โ€“] infinite_ass@leminal.space 15 points 1 month ago

I'd call it a cultural artifact. We used to get married very young. In some cultures the kids are introduced to sex by the grandparents. And of course in our own culture the ideal of sexy beauty is a supermodel who looks like a 13 year old boy. It's a whirlwind wrapped in a psychosis for sure.

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

I chalk this up to not having a word to describe folks suffering from the condition as opposed to predators acting on their condition (or even predators just abusing children regardless of attraction). For a ton of people they use the word pedophile to mean someone who sexually abuses children. Because as soon as nuanced discussion about "pedophiles who don't abuse kids" come up, people accuse you of "defending pedophiles" but they use it to mean "defending people who abuse children."