this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
150 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8776 readers
334 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mettled@reddthat.com 62 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If Intel can't pay their own bills from Intel's money, they can be sold to a private company, file for chapter 11, or go out of business.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And let all those backdoors just walk away?

[–] Mettled@reddthat.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I assume that you're at least halfway joking about backdoors in Intel.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Intel silicon has historically had a lot of "bugs"...

[–] Mettled@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Every and any hardware manufacturer can or has.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What he means is the feature of having a lightweight OS with no documentation running under the OS you as a customer is running.

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/s/c6bhbowtrf

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

That's not going to go away by switching to AMD or some ARM implementation, they all have their own equivalent. Maybe if you're running some fully libre open-source RISC-V chip, but those are currently nowhere near capable of competing on the big stage for anything other than embedded/hobbyist stuff.

[–] LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

as much as I think Intel is dumb, it's definitely not in the consumers best interest for Intel to go out of business or absorbed into another company

[–] Mettled@reddthat.com 13 points 1 month ago

I will take Intel being sold or going under over cronyism and corporate welfare.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Why is it in anyone's best interest to keep it as a monopoly if it can't pay its bills? Its products are going to stagnate either way, injecting money is useless.