this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
253 points (97.0% liked)

Linux

48692 readers
1152 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I don't understand why people want immutable. I don't know all that much about Linux but on my Steamdeck it keeps getting in the way anytime I try to do anything

[–] UNY0N@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

You certainly have to learn new ways of doing things when you want to tinker, but they are basically UNBREAKABLE, which is my main plus point. I'm busy, I need my PC to be reliable. I don't want to have to troubleshoot stuff just to keep it up and running.

If I had more time I would really enjoy the tinkering, but I don't so I need my distro just work.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I personally don’t tinker much with the OS. I want it to stay out of the way and let me do things. In the case of Bazzite, everything I need for gaming is just there and works without me lifting a finger.

I like the safety and simplicity immutables bring.

If I’m doing something out of the ordinary, a temporary container usually suffices.

It’s really made the switch from Windows as a daily driver much easier.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Some people like it, I don't like and will never mess with it. I do understand why some folks like it. It's basically for those who want a system that'll never break to a point where they can't access their data. I just can't use it

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Immutable is fantastic in theory. Where it falls apart is having to basically rebuild the whole distro every time you want to make a change. It should be there your base distro is immutable, then any extra changes go on an additional mutable layer but that would be difficult to set up. (You'd need a package manager like Nixos or something.)

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

your base distro is immutable, then any extra changes go on an additional mutable layer

That is exactly how OsTree and other layering solutions work. Only Nix requires a whole distro rebuild.

[–] Darohan@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

And even then with nixos-rebuild switch you won't really notice that you're "rebuilding" anything

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It isn't, though. Package layering modifies the install itself. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/getting-started/#_flatpak_command_line

The big problem with the way ostree works is that installing things has side effects. Every item you install with ostree makes all future items slower to install, including regular os updates. This is a significant flaw in the way they designed it and really makes immutable oses less attractive.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not a flaw. Ostree is a last resort, you should be using containerized software. Layering a package should only be done when strictly necessary and not as the regular way to manage packages. If you need an overtly customized system, you use Nix or universal blue to design your new system declaratively and create your custom image.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is a flaw. Flatpak is great where it works but Flatpak doesn't solve all problems, neither does any one solution except os level modification. It can be a last resort by it should be a last resort that works. The layering system could be put together such that you don't get side effects of installing packages like that. It might be tough to fix but that doesn't make it not a flaw.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Please remember that no one is taking anything away from you. If you don't like it, you don't have to use it. Traditional package managing isn't going away any time soon. You are safe. Others can have their preferred tech, and you don't have to like it. It's ok to have different tastes.