this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
755 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58925 readers
3589 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are using the phone SDKs to verify that BankID was correctly installed, much like any other client side DRM.

[–] virku@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I don't think BankID has any sort of SDK that lets other apps access user data like that? All interaction with BankID I know of at least is triggered with the app needing authentication/signature opening a BankID session to the central service where you enter your authentication and then the BankID app is used as MFA to verify this.

Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying completely?

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What I meant was that the phone operating system has SDKs (e.g. google services on android) which the app uses to make sure it hasn't been tampered with, which makes it even harder to make an open source client.

It's the opposite of supplying an SDK for third party developers.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Or even run the app as is on a "non-compliant" os - like a rooted android.

[–] virku@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh I see. Thanks for the clarification. Is that something they could have gone without and still be as secure as possible?

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

Not if you ask them but taking the time to design a system that isn't reliant on a strong client (and then open sourcing it) would probably be more secure, and obviously more inclusive.

For instance, I'm very eager to switch to a lknux phone but having blockers like this is forcing me to stay on Android, even though I am sick and tired or the enshittification.

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they run verification through google/apple services. so we scandinacians can't use a degoogled/microg android phones at all. at one point (long long ago) they used to run their own which made it available on any platform, but that service mysteriously died the day ubuntu phone launched. very coincidental.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am not sure if this is true, maybe I am misunderstanding something. I use GrapheneOS and can use all banking services in Norway just fine. GrapheneOS does have a translation layer or something like that for Google Play Services, is that what you are thinking of?

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

ah, it's possible BankID has a different authentication process in norway. while it's privately owned, they probably have actual requirements and guidelines to follow in norway as opposed to sweden.