The tech isn't there yet. There are so often distracting flaws around the hands/feet. The AI doesn't really know what a human is, its just endlessly re-combining existing material.

[–] tux0r@feddit.de 40 points 10 months ago (10 children)

As much as I loathe having to reveal this to you, the shapeliness of the hands should be semi-negligible to most people who would love to have an image created from the statement "I want to see Billie Eilish's boobs".

[–] Rekorse@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just because the ai produces a model with Billie eilishes face and a naked body does not mean you've seen her nude for real.

Its the exact same as drawing a naked lady and then drawing Billie eilish's face on it.

If that really gets you off and really violates her autonomy in some way I'd be interested to hear how. Its not currently illegal to draw real people in fictional scenarios is it?

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Implicit in this statement is that people who're inclined to generate a visual simulacrum of a real person for fantasy purposes actually care if it's real. By definition, it's not. If "real" was an issue to them, they probably wouldn't bother with it.

load more comments (8 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)