this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
533 points (98.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44152 readers
1153 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mine would be creating pen and paper ciphers for my made up secret communication needs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Nemo@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would definitely still use an iPod if they hadn't fucked up iTunes so badly.

[โ€“] DJDarren@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Music is a fine replacement for iTunes. I still sync my iPods via with my new M2 MacBook Air. Works a treat.

[โ€“] Nemo@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But does it have Party Shuffle? That is what set iTunes apart.

[โ€“] DJDarren@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, I never used Party Shuffle. How did that work?

[โ€“] Nemo@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

You could select a playlist or smart playlist to draw from, and it would show you both the tracks it had recently played and the tracks it was about to play, and you could customize how much of each; you could also do what are now standard queue operations like delete, reordering, and refreshing the queue. What made Party Shuffle the absolute GOAT, though, was that you could change the input playlist without disturbing the queue or history; only when it was adding tracks would it pull from the input source. So you could be adjusting the playlist on the fly without affecting planned playback.

This combined with a tree of "smart" playlists that drew from other "smart" playlists allowed for a great degree of automation. By itself it allowed by a great degree of adjustment based on mood without having to micromanage the queue in way that contemporary music library apps just don't have.