this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
244 points (91.5% liked)

Games

31901 readers
1550 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 27 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They waited until they could file a few new patents, namely the catching and mounting mechanisms. Now they have a bit more legal standing it seems, although I'm not sure how this is all gonna shake out

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm going to pat in the crap out of everything.

Like if you push a button in the direction your character is facing you move in that direction. I'm going to patent that shit.

Then I'm going to patent that if you push button and the opposite direction of your character, if it's a 3D game you turn around. And then I have ab separate patent with having the character walk backwards.

I'll just take the absolute piss out of the most basic things and absolutely everything I can find. And then throw a bunch of frivolous patent lawsuits at Nintendo.

I know it's petty. But maybe a Nintendo like many other corporations in the gaming industry have just been around maybe a little too long and have lost the vision and the purpose. Cuz at this point Nintendo's not even trying. But they are heavily relying on nostalgia for sales. They're more known for being a litigious company than a gaming company.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Patents filed after your rival releases a product don’t work - it’s textbook prior art.

[–] Killer@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

They aren't "new" patents. They're divisional patents, essentially splitting an older patent into two different patents that retain the date of the parent patent.

Either way this is a pretty scummy move on Nintendo's part.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago

I remember reading that Japan is very weird in regards to patent law, there's almost no oversight whatsoever even for incredibly basic concepts like a title screen but there's kind of a general agreement not to sue eachother. Assuming thats true Nintendo is currently burning a lot of face right now by breaking that precident.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Not sure how it works in Japan but you're probably right. Edit: Was thinking about this article that lays out the known details pretty well