Programming

17022 readers

274 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

286

Oracle urged again to surrender JavaScript trademark (www.theregister.com)

submitted 2 days ago by nkat2112@sh.itjust.works to c/programming@programming.dev

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This article makes for an interesting read. Here follow two early paragraphs for context:

Oracle controls the JavaScript trademark because in 2009 it acquired Sun Microsystems, which applied to trademark the name with the US Patent and Trademark Office back in 1995. The trademark was granted in 2000.

While the database giant does not use the name for any commercial products, its ownership of the trademark has led JavaScript-oriented organizations such as events biz JSConf to adopt branding that avoids the term. As the signatories to the letter observe, the world's most popular programming language therefore can't have a conference that mentions what it's about.

Toward the end, the article mentions an initiative to legally pursue Oracle for trademark abandonment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 110 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Just call it Ecmascript and be done with it. The name JavaScript was misleading from the beginning. Well, Ecma sounds like a skin disease but who cares.

[–] lkdm@programming.dev 19 points 2 days ago

Ecmascript is classic, but WebScript might be better going forward.

[–] Undaunted@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 days ago

Writing it also feels as nice as a skin disease so it's fitting well.

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago

"I need some more [input] sanitizer for my eczema script, the console is red and inflamed whenever I check it."

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

SmegmaScript is just too close

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

SmegHeadScript

kryten

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 1 points 1 day ago

This is the solution.

All names have problems but this one has the least.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like the modern name for it would be just "Script".

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

That's way too broad. Scripting is a pretty broad concept.

[–] aticmel@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago

but then we have a massive problem that affects millions of people if we call it EcmaScript. POJO becomes POEO, which violates English. Anyone speaking or writing English is negatively affected by the change from POJO to POEO. We should definitely pay Oracle billions of dollars to avoid confusing people about whether it's POI-oh or POYO... keep it POJO.