this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
1075 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5720 readers
1986 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not really a meme, I know, but I thought this was amazing and worth sharing and I didn't know where else to share it on Lemmy.

Ursula LeGuin was an incredible person and, although she did live a long life, her death was still a huge loss.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have re-read all of the books and short stories a couple of times. They're really good. The BBC did a radio dramatization of the books a few years ago. It was pretty abridged, but still worth hearing.

Mainly though, I just wanted to point out how Rowling very clearly used LeGuin as a source for her books (along with the Worst Witch books, the first of which came out when she was exactly the right age to have read them).

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Haven't heard of the worst witch, I don't think, unless that's the one that also uses a magical platform at kings cross

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're British, I can't explain that. If you aren't, it's big in the UK (or at least used to be?) not only a whole book series, but a movie and a TV series.

The movie stars a very young Fairuza Balk and was big enough to get Diana Rigg and Tim Curry in it.

So not exactly Harry Potter, but still well-known. And certainly known well enough for Rowling to not have only heard of them, but very likely at least read the first one because she was 9 years old when it came out, which is pretty much the perfect age for that book.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

No, sadly I live in the US :(